IT AI Index

Index › Products › Enzuzo · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Enzuzo

12Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enzuzo was named 3 times in DSPM and 1 other category, where Microsoft Purview led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market47 of 105

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enzuzo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Data security posture management	Security operations	0%	47 of 105	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18%
Compliance automation	Security operations	0%	43 of 67	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enzuzo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enzuzo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase7 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enzuzo, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enzuzo was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview4 of 120Not among the top eight

OvalEdge3 of 123Not among the top eight

Vanta3 of 121Not among the top eight

Atlan3 of 120Not among the top eight

Ketch3 of 120Not among the top eight

Apache Atlas2 of 121Not among the top eight

IBM Guardium2 of 121Not among the top eight

Secoda2 of 121Not among the top eight

Airtable2 of 120Not among the top eight

Alation2 of 120Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enzuzo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Enzuzo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enzuzo.comYour site12

g2.com6

learn.g2.com6

ovaledge.com6

atlan.com5

gartner.com4

salesforce.com4

sourceforge.net4

integrate.io3

kanerika.com3

Forty-one of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Enzuzo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

enzuzo.com/blog/data-governance-software6

learn.g2.com/best-data-governance-tools5

salesforce.com/data/governance/guide/tools4

g2.com/categories/data-governance-tools/small-business3

atlan.com/data-governance-tools2

atlan.com/know/data-governance-platforms2

aws.amazon.com/smart-business/resources-for-smb/data-governance-checklist2

capterra.com/p/185548/Atlan2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

enzuzo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enzuzo takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Purview takes 18%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “dspm platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “dspm platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 320 a month (“enzuzo”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 11,682 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,347 · 137 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,501
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2025, as Digital Funda, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 1 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 47 of 105 in DSPM

Segment leader

18%

Microsoft Purview

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 12 answers
Its own site cited: in 12 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on enzuzo.com

527

subdomains included

Content

463

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Glossary or explainer	224	3	2026-09-28	MFA
Blog	180	15	2026-09-29	GRC, TPRM
Comparison	53	10	2026-09-28
Case study	3	undated
Template or tool	3	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Why patagonia is one of the most trusted brands of all time blog
2026-09-28What is consent management platform glossary or explainer
2026-09-28Osano competitors alternatives comparison
2026-09-25Consent management blog
2026-09-20Washington mhmda blog
2026-09-20Pipeda penalties enforcement blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page enzuzo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Enzuzo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Enzuzo; a claim can dispute any of them.

Enzuzo / Osano 1

Follow Enzuzo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Enzuzo is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Consent Management Platform for Mid-Market
enzuzo.com
For: mid-market teams, platforms, ecommerce sites, and agencies
enzuzo.com
Price stated: No $10K minimum, flat per-domain pricing built for many sites. enzuzo.com
Starting price: 9/month enzuzo.com
Free plan or trial: free forever plan with limited features and traffic caps enzuzo.com
Integrations claimed: 2 enzuzo.com/pricing
Certifications: Google-certified CMPGoogle CMP GoldGoogle CMP Partner GoldIAB TCF 2.3IAB Europe TCF v2.3SOC 2Microsoft UET CertifiedSOC 2 Certified
Customers named: Revenue.ioLucy GroupBeaconYaleJane AppDE NOVO MARKETINGSkechersTurtle Wax
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What Enzuzo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: enzuzo.com, enzuzo.com/pricing, enzuzo.com/case-studies, enzuzo.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enzuzo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enzuzo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enzuzo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Enzuzo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enzuzo, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.