AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Enjo · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Enjo

3Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enjo was named 2 times in AI IT agents, where Freshservice with Freddy AI led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai it agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Enjo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI IT support agentsIT operations and endpoint0%40 of 1210%2under 10 labels · led by Freshservice with Freddy AI at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enjo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enjo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enjo is an AI-driven support automation platform tailored for large companies that trains AI agents on company-specific data” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI IT agents · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you want a standalone AI-native solution, consider Enjo or Decagon.” Mistral Small · AI IT agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enjo, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enjo was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Salesforce Agentforce2 of 31Not among the top eight
Intercom Fin1 of 31Not among the top eight
Zendesk AI Agents1 of 31Not among the top eight
ClearFeed AI Agent1 of 30Not among the top eight
Decagon1 of 30Not among the top eight
Gladys1 of 30Not among the top eight
HappyFox Assist AI1 of 30Not among the top eight
Moveworks1 of 30Not among the top eight
Resolve.ai1 of 30Not among the top eight
Rezolve.ai1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enjo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Enjo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

enjo.aiYour site3
aimultiple.com2
eesel.ai2
g2.com2
helply.com2
bland.ai1
blog.invgate.com1
botpress.com1
capterra.com1
clearfeed.ai1

Thirteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Enjo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on enjo.ai
481
subdomains included
Content
226
counted in the table below
Documentation
193
Product · Integration
15 · 19
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog190282026-09-28ITSM
Comparison2292026-08-04ITSM
Case study10undated
Glossary or explainer312026-07-23
Report or ebook1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page enjo.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Enjo

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Enjo is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Support Agent That Resolves Requests End to End
For
large enterprises
Price stated
A tenth of the cost of leading incumbent platforms. enjo.ai
Starting price
0 enjo.ai/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start free, no credit card, live the same day. enjo.ai
Integrations claimed
20 enjo.ai · 100 enjo.ai/integrations pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR compliant
Customers named
Amber GroupRakutenBookMyShoweDreams ODIGEOCubicYotpoAuroraTop Global Crypto Exchange
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Enjo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: enjo.ai, enjo.ai/pricing, enjo.ai/product/inbox, enjo.ai/case-studies, enjo.ai/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enjo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enjo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enjo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Enjo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enjo, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enjo.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.