AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Decagon · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Decagon

10Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Decagon was named 4 times in AI IT agents, where Freshservice with Freddy AI led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai it agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Decagon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI IT support agentsIT operations and endpoint2%14 of 1210%4under 10 labels · led by Freshservice with Freddy AI at 11%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Decagon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Decagon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“### 1. Decagon - Specifically designed for mid-market companies” MiniMax M2.5 · AI IT agents · direct prompt · first choice
“Recommended for mid-market teams seeking a focused AI agent with proven ROI” Mistral Small · AI IT agents · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Decagon (Best for Complex B2B Technical Products)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI IT agents · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Decagon, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Decagon was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zendesk AI Agents5 of 101Not among the top eight
Moveworks4 of 102Not among the top eight
ServiceNow Now Assist3 of 102Not among the top eight
Ada3 of 100Not among the top eight
Aisera3 of 100Not among the top eight
Forethought3 of 100Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce2 of 101Not among the top eight
Atomicwork2 of 100Not among the top eight
Espressive2 of 100Not among the top eight
Freshservice2 of 100Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Decagon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named Decagon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eesel.ai7
monday.com4
moveworks.com4
usefini.com4
g2.com3
aimultiple.com2
bland.ai2
cygnet.one2
decagon.aiYour site2
designrush.com2

Thirty of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Decagon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

decagon.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Decagon takes 2% of first choices and Freshservice with Freddy AI takes 11%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai it support agents”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai agent for it support”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
60,500 a month (“decagon”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
1,155 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 62,756 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,906 · 314 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,987
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 1,815 clicks and $47,716 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 95 video, 20 text, 5 image · 34 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Decagon AI, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 120 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 14 of 121 in AI IT agents
Segment leader
11%
Freshservice with Freddy AI
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
10 answers
Its own site cited
in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on decagon.ai
563
subdomains included
Content
481
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
12 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer261undated
Blog161372026-10-02
Case study23232026-09-25
Podcast or video1922026-07-27
Comparison1122026-09-02
Report or ebook612026-09-09

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page decagon.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Decagon

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Decagon is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI concierge for every customer
For
the enterprise
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPAHIPAAEU AI ACTISO 27001:2022PCI DSS 4.0.1
Hosting
USAEU
Customers named
ChimeRipplingClassPassNotionEventbriteOuraBiltAffirm
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Decagon's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: decagon.ai, trust.decagon.ai, decagon.ai/product/aop, decagon.ai/case-studies, decagon.ai/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Decagon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Decagon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Decagon by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Decagon is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Decagon, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at decagon.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.