Index › Products › Disco · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Disco

9Judge labels

1First choices

2Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Disco was named 5 times in Process mining, where Apromore led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 63

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 61

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In process mining · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Disco for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Process mining	IT operations and endpoint	2%	16 of 61	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Apromore at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Disco yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Disco across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need the easiest no-budget first analysis with CSV logs → Disco free tier / mindzie Desktop up to 1,000 cases.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Process mining · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“These are excellent for data scientists but dangerous for business operations teams.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Process mining · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Disco, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Disco was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Celonis Process Intelligence Platform8 of 90Not among the top eight

IBM Process Mining5 of 91Not among the top eight

SAP Signavio Process Intelligence5 of 90Not among the top eight

UiPath Process Mining5 of 90Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power Automate4 of 90Not among the top eight

ProM4 of 90Not among the top eight

ProcessMind3 of 91Not among the top eight

Apromore2 of 92Not among the top eight

Bizagi2 of 90Not among the top eight

Logpickr2 of 90Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Disco. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 9 answers that named Disco and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bardeen.ai5

g2.com5

softwaresuggest.com5

itechguides.com4

learn.g2.com4

omr.com4

processmind.com4

erpresearch.com3

historytools.org3

processminingpro.com3

No domain is on file for Disco, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

softwaresuggest.com/process-mining-tools5

bardeen.ai/best/process-intelligence-software4

bardeen.ai/best/process-mining-tools4

learn.g2.com/best-process-mining-software4

omr.com/en/reviews/category/process-mining4

erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/process-mining3

historytools.org/ai/process-mining-software-comparison3

apromore.com/product2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Disco stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 1,220,000 a month (“disco”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 46,090 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 61 in process mining

Segment leader

19%

Apromore

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Disco

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Disco; a claim can dispute any of them.

Disco by Fluxicon 2Disco (Free Version) 1

Follow Disco

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Disco's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Disco, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Disco by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Disco is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Disco, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.