IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › DeviceLock · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

DeviceLock

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. DeviceLock was named 1 time in DLP, where Microsoft Purview DLP led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market70 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named DeviceLock for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	0%	70 of 84	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DeviceLock yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DeviceLock across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“found instances of basic security flaws in six of the eight products, including unencrypted communications, unauthenticated commands, and cross-site scripting vulnerabilities” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DeviceLock, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DeviceLock was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GTB1 of 10Not in the top three

MyDLP1 of 10Not in the top three

Netwrix Endpoint Protector1 of 10Not in the top three

OpenDLP1 of 10Not in the top three

Sophos1 of 10Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention1 of 10Not in the top three

Trend Micro1 of 10Not in the top three

Websense1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DeviceLock. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 1 answers that named DeviceLock and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

acsmi.org1

aimultiple.com1

concentric.ai1

en.wikipedia.org1

g2.com1

image-ppubs.uspto.gov1

paloaltonetworks.com1

polymerhq.io1

seraphicsecurity.com1

strac.io1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming DeviceLock came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

acsmi.org/blogs/best-data-loss-prevention-dlp-software-directory-amp-reviews1

aimultiple.com/data-loss-prevention1

concentric.ai/data-loss-prevention-dlp-software-tools-top-vendors-compared-in-20261

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_loss_prevention_software1

g2.com/categories/data-loss-prevention-dlp1

g2.com/categories/data-loss-prevention-dlp/resources1

image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/123166861

image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/124077371

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DeviceLock's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DeviceLock, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at devicelock.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.