IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Backblaze Business Backup · September 2026 Edition
Backblaze · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Backblaze Business Backup

11Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Backblaze Business Backup was named 2 times in Backup and DR, where Veeam led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In backup and dr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Backblaze Business Backup for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Backup and disaster recoveryCloud and infrastructure0%37 of 1210%2under 10 labels · led by Veeam at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Backblaze Business Backup yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Backblaze Business Backup across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need basic, low-cost backup for endpoints/files: Go with Backblaze Business.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Backup and DR · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“IDrive Business or Backblaze Business Backup may be more suitable” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Backup and DR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Backblaze Business Backup, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Backblaze Business Backup was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Acronis Cyber Protect10 of 115Not in the top three
Veeam Data Platform6 of 112Not in the top three
IDrive Business6 of 111Not in the top three
Cove Data Protection3 of 110Not in the top three
Commvault2 of 110Not in the top three
Veeam Backup Essentials2 of 110Not in the top three
Wasabi2 of 110Not in the top three
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud1 of 111Not in the top three
Synology NAS + Active Backup1 of 111Not in the top three
Axcient x360Recover1 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Backblaze Business Backup. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named Backblaze Business Backup and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hyperconvergence.com6
ninjaone.com5
solutionsreview.com5
veeam.com5
axcient.com4
expertinsights.com4
gartner.com4
helixstax.com4
ifeeltech.com4
pcmag.com4

Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Backblaze Business Backup came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Backblaze Business Backup's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Backblaze Business Backup, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at backblaze.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack