Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 47 of 69, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedCyber Sierra
7Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cyber Sierra was named 2 times in GRC and 1 other category, where Hyperproof led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market48 of 75
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 67
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
In grc · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cyber Sierra for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC platforms | Security operations | 0% | 48 of 75 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hyperproof at 19% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Third-party risk management | Security operations | 0% | 38 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 55% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cyber Sierra held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · GRC · by segment
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 of 65, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRC | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 48 of 75, unchanged |
| TPRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 38 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cyber Sierra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cyber Sierra across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: SMBs/Mid-sized companies ... affordable for mid-market” MiniMax M2.5 · TPRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cyber Sierra, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyber Sierra was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cyber Sierra, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyber Sierra was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cyber Sierra. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Cyber Sierra and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cybersierra.coYour site7
orbiqhq.com4
vanta.com4
complyjet.com3
enzuzo.com3
g2.com3
larksuite.com3
panorays.com3
securityboulevard.com3
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com2
Twenty-eight of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Cyber Sierra came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cybersierra.co ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cyber Sierra takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cybersierra.co ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cyber Sierra takes 0% of first choices and Hyperproof takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “grc platform”
5
Position for “grc platforms”
–
not in the top ten
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 48 of 75 in GRC
Segment leader
19%
Hyperproof
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 7 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 7 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cybersierra.co
934
subdomains included
Content
908
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 437 | undated | GRC, TPRM | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 413 | undated | Logs | ||
| Comparison | 28 | undated | GRC, Email security | ||
| Report or ebook | 13 | undated | TPRM, ITSM | ||
| Template or tool | 10 | undated | GRC | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | TPRM | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cybersierra.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Cyber Sierra
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cyber Sierra is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Cyber Sierra is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Agentic GRC for enterprise cybersecurity
- For
- enterprise security leaders
- Price stated
- Enterprise pricing is determined during your briefing. cybersierra.co/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 140 cybersierra.co · 135 cybersierra.co/pricing pages disagree
- Certifications
- IMDA AccreditedAI for Cyber Center of ExcellenceAI Trailblazer AwardAI Trailblazer AwardWinner, Smart Nation Singapore & GoogleIMDA AccreditedAs of 1 April 2026AI for Cyber Center of ExcellenceSolution Provider, CSA Singapore · 2026
- Hosting
- Air-gappedOn-premHybridCloud of your ChoiceAWSAzureGCP
- Customers named
- Fortune 500 Financial InstitutionGovernment Agency, Defense SectorASX-Listed Bank, 12 CountriesGlobal Bank, ASEAN RegionMultinational Conglomerate, 30+ CountriesRegional Insurance GroupFortune 500 insurerBoxo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial
What Cyber Sierra's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: cybersierra.co, cybersierra.co/pricing, cybersierra.co/glossary/compliance, cybersierra.co/platform-ccm, cybersierra.co/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyber Sierra's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyber Sierra, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cyber Sierra by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cyber Sierra is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cyber Sierra, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.