IT AI Index

Index › Products › Cube.dev · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Cube.dev

8Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cube.dev was named 2 times in Embedded analytics, where Metabase led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market31 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 69

under the label threshold

In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cube.dev for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Embedded analytics	Data platform	0%	31 of 72	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Metabase at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cube.dev yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cube.dev across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider include Thinklytics Insights, Zoho, Cube.dev, and Omni.co” Llama 4 Maverick · Embedded analytics · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cube.dev, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cube.dev was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Metabase3 of 82Not among the top eight

Microsoft Power BI Embedded3 of 80Not among the top eight

ThoughtSpot Embedded3 of 80Not among the top eight

Embeddable2 of 80Not among the top eight

Lightdash2 of 80Not among the top eight

Looker2 of 80Not among the top eight

Luzmo2 of 80Not among the top eight

Power BI Embedded2 of 80Not among the top eight

Sisense2 of 80Not among the top eight

Tableau2 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cube.dev. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Cube.dev and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cube.devYour site8

omni.co5

embeddable.com4

holistics.io4

luzmo.com4

basedash.com3

knowi.com3

dev.to2

docs.cube.devYour site2

g2.com2

Twenty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Cube.dev came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cube.dev/articles/best-embedded-analytics-platforms-20267

omni.co/articles/best-embedded-analytics-tools-20265

holistics.io/blog/best-embedded-analytics-tools4

embeddable.com/blog/embedded-analytics-pricing-and-benefit-comparison3

cube.dev/pricing2

dev.to/maxbonnard/best-embedded-analytics-tools-for-saas-in-2026-5d0o2

docs.cube.dev/embedding2

g2.com/categories/embedded-business-intelligence2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

cube.dev ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Cube.dev takes 0% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “embedded analytics platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “embedded analytics platforms”

Organic visits to its site: about 5,632 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,322 · 104 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 2,587
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

9 ads · 9 text · 2 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as Cube Dev, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year, 6 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 31 of 72 in embedded analytics

Segment leader

22%

Metabase

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 8 answers
Its own site cited: in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on cube.dev

1,824

subdomains included

Content

932

counted in the table below

Documentation

553

Product · Integration

9 · 63

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	395	45	2026-09-22	Embedded analytics, ETL
Template or tool	305	undated
Conference or event	150	undated		Embedded analytics, Data warehouses
Case study	30	undated		Embedded analytics
Glossary or explainer	21	11	2026-09-28	Embedded analytics
Report or ebook	14	0	2022-09-15
Comparison	13	5	2026-08-04	ETL, Embedded analytics
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated

Most recent

2026-09-28What is natural language query glossary or explainer
2026-09-24What is generative bi glossary or explainer
2026-09-22Open source semantic layer blog
2026-09-21What is augmented analytics glossary or explainer
2026-09-17Archive blog
2026-09-17Cube snowflake coco blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page cube.dev exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Cube.dev

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cube.dev is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: The agentic analytics platform built on a semantic layer
cube.dev
For: BI for both humans and AI agents — for your team and your customers.
cube.dev
Price stated: Free; $40per developer / month; $80per developer / month; Custom cube.dev/pricing
Starting price: $40per developer / month cube.dev/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free forever cube.dev/pricing
Integrations claimed: 50 cube.dev
Certifications: GDPRHIPAASOC 2 Type II
Hosting: USA
Customers named: BrexAlconDrataWebflowRamSoftCloud AcademyCOTASecurityScorecard

What Cube.dev's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: cube.dev, cube.dev/pricing, trust.cube.dev, cube.dev/product/data-apis, cube.dev/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cube.dev's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cube.dev, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cube.dev by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Cube.dev is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cube.dev, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.