Index › Products › CoW Swap · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

CoW Swap

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CoW Swap was named 3 times in DEX, where ControlUp led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market37 of 219

under the label threshold

Enterprise35 of 182

under the label threshold

In dex · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoW Swap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital employee experience	IT operations and endpoint	0%	37 of 219	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ControlUp at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoW Swap yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoW Swap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“a DEX aggregation layer (1inch Fusion, CoW Swap, or a platform like Talos/Maple/Rango)” Kimi K2 · DEX · scale prompt · alternative

“CoW Swap is highly recommended for budget-minded companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DEX · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for Large/Institutional Orders” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DEX · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoW Swap, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoW Swap was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Uniswap4 of 70Not among the top eight

Nexthink Infinity3 of 71Not among the top eight

1inch3 of 70Not among the top eight

1inch Network2 of 71Not among the top eight

TeamViewer DEX2 of 71Not among the top eight

Balancer2 of 70Not among the top eight

Jupiter2 of 70Not among the top eight

Lakeside SysTrack2 of 70Not among the top eight

Matcha2 of 70Not among the top eight

Uniswap v32 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoW Swap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named CoW Swap and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coingape.com3

us.fitgap.com3

btcc.com2

chainup.com2

coinbureau.com2

cryptiecraft.com2

digitalitnews.com2

eco.com2

f6s.com2

quicknode.com2

No domain is on file for CoW Swap, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

us.fitgap.com/search/cryptocurrency-exchanges/enterprise3

chainup.com/blog/dex-for-business-enterprise-guide2

coinbureau.com/analysis/best-decentralized-exchanges2

coingape.com/dex-aggregators2

cryptiecraft.com/dex-development-cost-20262

digitalitnews.com/comparing-todays-leading-dex-platforms2

teamviewer.com/en-us/special/best-digital-employee-experience-software2

youtube.com/watch2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CoW Swap

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CoW Swap; a claim can dispute any of them.

CoW Swap (CoW Protocol) 1

Follow CoW Swap

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoW Swap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoW Swap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CoW Swap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where CoW Swap is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name CoW Swap, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.