Index › Products › Uniswap v3 · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Uniswap v3

10Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

7 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Uniswap v3 was named 4 times in DEX, where ControlUp led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business42 of 188

under the label threshold

Mid-market38 of 219

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 182

under the label threshold

In dex · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uniswap v3 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Digital employee experience	IT operations and endpoint	0%	38 of 219	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by ControlUp at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uniswap v3 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uniswap v3 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labels3not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“stick with well-established, audited, and community-driven DEXs (e.g., Uniswap V3, Curve Finance, Aave, Balancer V2)” MiniMax M2.5 · DEX · negative prompt · first choice

“Safer Choices (High Volume, Audited): Uniswap V3 (Ethereum/Arbitrum)” Grok 4.1 Fast · DEX · negative prompt · first choice

“Leverage open-source frameworks like Uniswap v3 or Balancer” Kimi K2 · DEX · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Largest liquidity, but not budget‑friendly for a small company or test‑run.” MiniMax M2.5 · DEX · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uniswap v3, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uniswap v3 was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Balancer5 of 100Not among the top eight

Curve Finance5 of 100Not among the top eight

Raydium4 of 100Not among the top eight

SushiSwap4 of 100Not among the top eight

Drift Protocol3 of 100Not among the top eight

PancakeSwap v33 of 100Not among the top eight

PancakeSwap2 of 102Not among the top eight

Balancer V22 of 100Not among the top eight

CoW Swap2 of 100Not among the top eight

dYdX2 of 100Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uniswap v3. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named Uniswap v3 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chainup.com3

gate.com3

linkedin.com3

appinventiv.com2

arxiv.org2

binance.com2

changelly.com2

coinbureau.com2

coinspeaker.com2

eco.com2

No domain is on file for Uniswap v3, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

appinventiv.com/blog/decentralized-exchange-development-guide2

arxiv.org/pdf/2112.073862

binance.com/en/square/post/123350987670892

chainup.com/blog/most-popular-decentralized-exchanges-dexs2

changelly.com/blog/best-decentralized-cryptocurrency-exchanges2

coinbureau.com/analysis/best-decentralized-exchanges2

coinspeaker.com/guides/best-decentralized-exchanges2

eco.com/support/en/articles/11827084-best-dexs-in-2026-fees-volume-ranked2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Uniswap v3 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“uniswap v3”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 38 of 219 in DEX

Segment leader

13%

ControlUp

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 10 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Uniswap v3

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Uniswap v3; a claim can dispute any of them.

Uniswap V3 2

Follow Uniswap v3

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uniswap v3's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uniswap v3, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uniswap v3 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Uniswap v3 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Uniswap v3, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.