| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital employee experience | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 7 of 219 | 11% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Uniswap – Best Overall / Ethereum DeFi leader. Uniswap V3+V4 is the largest DEX by market share and 30-day spot volume.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DEX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DEX · negative prompt · first choice
“Uniswap leads spot trading at approximately $73 billion in 30-day volume across its multi-chain deployment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DEX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Uniswap remains one of the most dominant DEX in 2026, with a daily trading volume exceeding $2 billion” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DEX · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“you should generally avoid single-pool retail DEXs (like Uniswap) to prevent high slippage and front-running” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DEX · direct prompt · hard negative
“Projects can launch on platforms like Uniswap or PancakeSwap without rigorous vetting, developers can remain completely anonymous” Muse Glimmer 30B · DEX · negative prompt · soft negative
“rather than "raw" MetaMask-to-Uniswap” Kimi K2 · DEX · scale prompt · soft negative
“Good, but gas adds up” Grok 4.1 Fast · DEX · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 88 of the 95 answers that named Uniswap and are not a share of its labels.
270 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Uniswap came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 173 | 12 | 2026-09-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2025-05-06 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-03 |
Every page uniswap.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Uniswap's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: uniswap.org, uniswap.org/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uniswap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uniswap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uniswap by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: