AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Contentsquare · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Contentsquare

4Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Contentsquare was named 3 times in Uptime monitoring, where UptimeRobot led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uptime monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Contentsquare for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Website and synthetic monitoringIT operations and endpoint0%56 of 6733%3under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Contentsquare yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Contentsquare across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Higher price points, more complex implementations. Often targeted at larger enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Contentsquare, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Contentsquare was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Site24x74 of 42Not among the top eight
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring4 of 41Not among the top eight
New Relic Synthetics4 of 40Not among the top eight
Checkly3 of 41Not among the top eight
Pingdom3 of 40Not among the top eight
Dynatrace2 of 40Not among the top eight
FullStory2 of 40Not among the top eight
UptimeRobot2 of 40Not among the top eight
Better Stack1 of 40Not among the top eight
Catchpoint1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Contentsquare. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Contentsquare and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

contentsquare.comYour site4
alertping.com3
motadata.com3
zendikt.com3
itechguides.com2
scmgalaxy.com2
site24x7.com2
softwaresuggest.com2
sourceforge.net2
atatus.com1

Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Contentsquare came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

contentsquare.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Contentsquare takes 0% of first choices and UptimeRobot takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “uptime monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “website monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,900 a month (“contentsquare”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
101 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 149,925 a month
Searches its site ranks for
17,931 · 918 in the top three
Sites linking to it
52,453
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
119+ ads · 82 text, 37 video · 86 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as CONTENT SQUARE, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 90 in the year, 29 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 56 of 67 in uptime monitoring
Segment leader
24%
UptimeRobot
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on contentsquare.com
2,114
subdomains included
Content
1,332
counted in the table below
Documentation
3
Product · Integration
52 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Report or ebook710undated
Blog29802025-01-20
Case study159undated
News or press87undated
Comparison61undated
Glossary or explainer9undated
Podcast or video5undated
Template or tool3undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page contentsquare.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Contentsquare

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Contentsquare is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
all-in-one experience intelligence platform
For
enterprise and mid-market brands
Price stated
Free $0; Growth $49$39; Pro Let's talk; Enterprise Let's talk contentsquare.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start for free contentsquare.com
Integrations claimed
100 contentsquare.com · 115 contentsquare.com/pricing pages disagree
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2 ReportISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018ISO 27701SOC 2 Type IIISO 9001:2015ISO/IEC 27001
Customers named
AudiSpecsaversPirelliEasyjetJohn LewisHanesOcadoAdmiral
Not stated on the pages read
Hosting

What Contentsquare's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: contentsquare.com, contentsquare.com/pricing, trust.contentsquare.com, contentsquare.com/platform, contentsquare.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Contentsquare's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Contentsquare, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Contentsquare by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Contentsquare is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Contentsquare, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contentsquare.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.