IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Complies.ai · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Complies.ai

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Complies.ai was named 3 times in Compliance automation and 1 other category, where Drata led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business19 of 60

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In compliance automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Complies.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	2%	10 of 54	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%
Third-party risk management	Security operations	0%	39 of 72	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by UpGuard at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Complies.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Complies.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with SecureSlate or Complies.ai as they offer the best value with transparent pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

“followed closely by Complies.ai if you also require compliance automation” Qwen 3.7 Flash · TPRM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Complies.ai, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Complies.ai was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sprinto3 of 42Not in the top three

Drata3 of 40Not in the top three

Vanta3 of 40Not in the top three

Secureframe2 of 40Not in the top three

Vendorapp1 of 41Not in the top three

AuditBoard1 of 40Not in the top three

CATAAM1 of 40Not in the top three

HiComply1 of 40Not in the top three

LowerPlane1 of 40Not in the top three

OneTrust1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Complies.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Complies.ai and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

complies.aiYour site4

incorp.com3

us.fitgap.com3

capterra.com2

complyjet.com2

consilien.com2

expertinsights.com2

getsecureslate.com2

netwrix.com2

optro.ai2

Twenty of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Complies.ai came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

incorp.com/resources/knowledge-base/best-compliance-tools3

complies.ai/alternatives2

consilien.com/news/best-compliance-automation-platforms-20262

expertinsights.com/compliance/the-top-compliance-automation-tools2

getsecureslate.com/blog/top-7-affordable-compliance-platforms-for-smart-compliance2

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/compliance-automation-platforms2

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools2

orbiqhq.com/compliance-automation/compliance-automation-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Complies.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Complies.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.

Complies 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Complies.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Complies.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at complies.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.