Every category where a model named CATAAM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance automation	Security operations	6%	4 of 54	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Drata at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CATAAM yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CATAAM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels3

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best compliance automation platform for a company with a limited budget is likely to be CATAAM, Ciphrix, Sprinto, or LowerPlane” Llama 4 Maverick · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

“the best compliance automation platform for a company with a limited budget is CATAAM” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

“CATAAM may be a more suitable choice compared to the more expensive, legacy options.” Mistral Small · Compliance automation · negative prompt · first choice

“CATAAM is currently the most cost-effective option” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CATAAM, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CATAAM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Drata5 of 60Not in the top three

Vanta5 of 60Not in the top three

LowerPlane4 of 61Not in the top three

Sprinto3 of 61Not in the top three

Scytale2 of 60Not in the top three

Secureframe2 of 60Not in the top three

Ciphrix1 of 60Not in the top three

Complies.ai1 of 60Not in the top three

ComplyJet1 of 60Not in the top three

Scrut1 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CATAAM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named CATAAM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cataam.comYour site6

auditxyz.com5

ciphrix.com4

consilien.com4

complyjet.com3

cynomi.com3

incorp.com3

optro.ai3

capterra.com2

getsecureslate.com2

Twenty-nine of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming CATAAM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cataam.com/compare/best-compliance-automation-software6

auditxyz.com/compare/best-compliance-automation-platforms5

ciphrix.com/blog/compliance-software/affordable-compliance-automation-tools4

consilien.com/news/best-compliance-automation-platforms-20264

cynomi.com/learn/compliance-automation-tools3

incorp.com/resources/knowledge-base/best-compliance-tools3

optro.ai/blog/compliance-automation-tools3

capterra.com/resources/best-compliance-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CATAAM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CATAAM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cataam.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.