2 categories · Named, not rankedComp AI
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyber risk quantification | Security operations | 2% | 15 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by CyberSaint CyberStrong at 25% | |
| Compliance automation | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 67 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Drata at 34% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Comp AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Comp AI is notable because its packages start at $3,000 with no annual contract, which is relatively budget-friendly” Perplexity Sonar · Cyber risk quant · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Budget Pick: Comp AI” Kimi K2 · Compliance automation · budget prompt · first choice
“A compliance automation platform that is free to self-host under the AGPL open-source license.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Compliance automation · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Comp AI, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Comp AI was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Comp AI and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Thirty-two of the thirty-six domain citations in answers naming Comp AI came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Template or tool | 26 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 15 | undated | |||
| Case study | 11 | undated | |||
| Blog | 10 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated | TPRM | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page trycomp.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Comp AI
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Comp AI is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI Compliance Software
- For
- startups to enterprise
- Price stated
- Free tools available trycomp.ai
- Starting price
- 0 trycomp.ai
- Free plan or trial
- Free tools available trycomp.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 580 trycomp.ai
- Certifications
- SOC 2ISO 27001HIPAAGDPR
- Hosting
- Web-based
- Customers named
- Persona AIDocspringLuthor AICapgoShiftControlSessionLabZernioRiskInMind
What Comp AI's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: trycomp.ai, trycomp.ai, trycomp.ai/pricing, trycomp.ai/security, trycomp.ai/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Comp AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Comp AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Comp AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Comp AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Comp AI, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.