Every category where a model named Cohesity for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Backup and disaster recovery	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	20 of 121	6%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cohesity yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cohesity across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	1	1	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels2

Paraphrase8 labelsNone

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise-grade "data security first" platforms... though usually at a premium price point.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · scale prompt · alternative

“Rubrik or Cohesity: If ransomware/cyber resilience is priority #1 and budget allows” Grok 4.1 Fast · Backup and DR · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Instant mass restores, data consolidation... Complex for smaller setups” Grok 4.1 Fast · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cohesity for data management consolidation at scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Backup and DR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“like Datto or Cohesity), which often comes with high recurring fees or expensive per-gigabyte pricing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Backup and DR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cohesity, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cohesity was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Commvault44 of 522Not in the top three

Rubrik43 of 522Not in the top three

Veeam34 of 5218Not in the top three

Druva28 of 522Not in the top three

Zerto17 of 520Not in the top three

Veeam Data Platform12 of 5210Not in the top three

Acronis10 of 520Not in the top three

Acronis Cyber Protect10 of 520Not in the top three

Dell Technologies9 of 520Not in the top three

Datto8 of 520Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cohesity. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 52 answers that named Cohesity and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

solutionsreview.com26

eon.io18

expertinsights.com17

technologymatch.com17

ninjaone.com15

gcom.pdo.aws.gartner.com13

worldmetrics.org13

techtarget.com12

veeam.com12

rubrik.com11

154 of the 154 domain citations in answers naming Cohesity came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/whats-changed-2024-gartner-magic-quadrant-for22

eon.io/blog/enterprise-backup-solutions17

technologymatch.com/blog/best-enterprise-backup-software-rpo-rto-comparison15

gcom.pdo.aws.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-backup-and-recovery-software-solutions13

ninjaone.com/blog/best-enterprise-backup-solutions10

solutionsreview.com/backup-disaster-recovery/the-best-backup-and-disaster-recovery-compani10

axcient.com/blog/backup-and-disaster-recovery-solutions9

c4cgroup.co.uk/guides/veeam-vs-rubrik-cohesity-commvault9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cohesity's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cohesity, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cohesity.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.