Every category where a model named CodeAnt AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Static application security testing	Developer platform	2%	7 of 47	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CodeAnt AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CodeAnt AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“choose CodeAnt AI for a typical mid-market B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · SAST · direct prompt · first choice

“If you need a single platform covering SAST + SCA + IaC + secrets, CodeAnt AI or Snyk are worth a deeper look.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · direct prompt · alternative

“Other notable options include CodeAnt AI Premium for those wanting a more consolidated solution” Mistral Small · SAST · direct prompt · alternative

“Teams that want AI‑assisted remediation and a "plug‑and‑play" experience” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CodeAnt AI, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CodeAnt AI was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Semgrep20 of 2017Not in the top three

SonarQube15 of 201Not in the top three

Snyk Code11 of 202Not in the top three

Checkmarx One9 of 200Not in the top three

Codacy8 of 200Not in the top three

Veracode8 of 200Not in the top three

Qodana7 of 200Not in the top three

Aikido Security6 of 200Not in the top three

Bandit6 of 200Not in the top three

CodeQL6 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CodeAnt AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named CodeAnt AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dev.to20

zeropath.com14

corgea.com13

endorlabs.com12

appsecsanta.com11

g2.com11

checkmarx.com9

codeant.aiYour site9

pixee.ai9

deepsource.com8

107 of the 116 domain citations in answers naming CodeAnt AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dev.to/rahulxsingh/i-reviewed-32-sast-tools-the-ones-worth-using-283e20

zeropath.com/blog/best-sast-tools13

corgea.com/learn/best-sast-tools11

endorlabs.com/learn/best-sast-tools11

g2.com/categories/static-application-security-testing-sast/small-business10

appsecsanta.com/sast-tools9

checkmarx.com/learn/sast/open-source-vs-premium-sast-tools9

dev.to/rahulxsingh/11-best-sast-tools-in-2026-static-application-security-testing-compared9

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CodeAnt AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CodeAnt AI; a claim can dispute any of them.

CodeAnt AI Premium 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CodeAnt AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CodeAnt AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at codeant.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.