Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 14 of 47
1 category · Named, not rankedCodacy
12Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Codacy was named 5 times in SAST, where Semgrep led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business15 of 51
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 71
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In sast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Codacy for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 22 of 71 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Codacy held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SAST · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 26 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAST | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 22 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Codacy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Codacy across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Lightweight, quick setup, zero-config feedback” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“It’s a paid platform ... However, if your budget is very tight, self‑hosted tools like Semgrep/ SonarQube are free.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SAST · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Codacy, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codacy was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Codacy, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Codacy was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Codacy. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 12 answers that named Codacy and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
dev.to11
checkmarx.com10
appsecsanta.com9
codeant.ai7
jit.io6
safeguard.sh6
gitautoreview.com5
plexicus.ai5
checkthat.ai4
zeropath.com4
Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Codacy came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
codacy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Codacy takes 0% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
codacy.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Codacy takes 0% of first choices and Semgrep takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sast tools”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 880 a month (“codacy”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,939 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,431 · 139 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,378
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 71 in SAST
Segment leader
36%
Semgrep
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 12 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on codacy.com
938
subdomains included
Content
594
counted in the table below
Documentation
275
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 468 | 28 | 2026-09-25 | SAST, SCA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 68 | 58 | 2026-09-07 | SAST, CSPM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | 0 | 2023-10-09 | ||
| Comparison | 18 | 2 | 2026-07-30 | SAST | |
| Case study | 12 | 0 | 2023-09-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2015-07-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2022-02-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Top agentic code review tools for loop engineering blog
- 2026-09-25How ai is changing the engineering manager role more context more capacity and the new job of protecting focus blog
- 2026-09-25Ai agent harness blog
- 2026-09-25Does your engineering team have a parallelization strategy for ai coding agents 2026 blog
- 2026-09-18Ai code review tools compared 2026 why most cant safely block a merge and what code governance fixes blog
- 2026-09-16Ai agent security backlog remediation pipeline how to build a remediation agent that closes its own issues 2026 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page codacy.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Codacy
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Codacy; a claim can dispute any of them.
Codacy Pro 1
Follow Codacy
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Codacy is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Codacy is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Code Quality & Security platform for AI-Assisted Engineering.
- For
- fast-moving engineering teams
- Price stated
- Free trial for 14 days, no credit card required codacy.com
- Starting price
- 0 codacy.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial for 14 days, no credit card required codacy.com
- Certifications
- SOC2 CompliantGDPR CompliantSOC2 Type 2-certified cloud infrastructure
- Customers named
- LSportsihomer
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Codacy's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: codacy.com, codacy.com/pricing, codacy.com/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Codacy's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Codacy, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Codacy by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Codacy is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Codacy, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.