2 categories · RankedVeracode
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 2% | 8 of 47 | 41% | 34 | criticized challenger |
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 0% | 34 of 49 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 40% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A cloud-based veteran known for stability and deep static/dynamic hybrid analysis.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Veracode if you want the safest default choice” Perplexity Sonar · SAST · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best overall enterprise choice: Checkmarx or Veracode” Perplexity Sonar · SAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“Checkmarx, Veracode, or Fortify are recommended if enterprise governance, compliance reporting, and mature procurement paths matter most.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SAST · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid legacy, binary-upload scanners... historically pioneered by tools like Veracode)... a major friction point for modern, fast-paced DevSecOps teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · negative prompt · hard negative
“Checkmarx One / Fortify / Vercode: ... They offer little value to small teams and are expensive to maintain.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SAST · budget prompt · hard negative
“traditional enterprise legacy tools (like Checkmarx or Veracode) are usually too expensive, slow, and noisy” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“they are rarely the right fit for mid-market B2B companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SAST · direct prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 122 answers that named Veracode and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
474 of the 474 domain citations in answers naming Veracode came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at veracode.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.