AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cisco ThousandEyes · October 2026 Edition
Cisco · 2 categories · Ranked

Cisco ThousandEyes

30Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Uptime monitoring for enterprise buyers
Rank 22 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In network monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cisco ThousandEyes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Network monitoring and managementNetwork and edge0%22 of 780%3under 10 labels · led by Auvik at 26%
Website and synthetic monitoringIT operations and endpoint0%21 of 670%2under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cisco ThousandEyes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cisco ThousandEyes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase13 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Highly distributed companies heavily reliant on SaaS and public cloud networks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Network monitoring · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cisco ThousandEyes is the best for network and internet path visibility” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cisco ThousandEyes, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cisco ThousandEyes was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Dynatrace17 of 307Not among the top eight
LogicMonitor14 of 304Not among the top eight
Kentik14 of 303Not among the top eight
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring12 of 304Not among the top eight
SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor11 of 303Not among the top eight
Datadog Network Monitoring11 of 300Not among the top eight
Paessler PRTG Network Monitor11 of 300Not among the top eight
Catchpoint9 of 301Not among the top eight
New Relic Synthetics8 of 301Not among the top eight
Auvik8 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cisco ThousandEyes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 30 answers that named Cisco ThousandEyes and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kentik.com19
motadata.com13
gartner.com10
logicmonitor.com10
contentsquare.com9
comparitech.com8
netdata.cloud7
newrelic.com7
worldmetrics.org7
zendikt.com7

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Cisco ThousandEyes came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Cisco ThousandEyes stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
1,000 a month (“cisco thousandeyes”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
72 a month
Its own site
It sits on Cisco's site (cisco.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 78 in network monitoring
Segment leader
26%
Auvik
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Cisco ThousandEyes

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Cisco is the company behind Cisco ThousandEyes.
ShowHide
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cisco ThousandEyes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cisco ThousandEyes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cisco ThousandEyes by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Cisco ThousandEyes is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cisco ThousandEyes, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cisco.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.