AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Check Point Software · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Check Point Software

8Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Check Point Software was named 3 times in AI security and 1 other category, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market88 of 233
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 155
2%4 labels
under the label threshold
In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Check Point Software for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI security platformsSecurity operations0%88 of 2330%2under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Data center networkingNetwork and edge0%127 of 165100%1under 10 labels · led by Arista Networks at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Check Point Software yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Check Point Software across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“a third CVE-2024-24919 in Check Point Software's Quantum Security Gateways, accounted for more half of the network devices vulnerabilities by volume” Muse Glimmer 30B · Data center networking · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Check Point Software, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Check Point Software was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
HiddenLayer2 of 81Not among the top eight
SentinelOne Singularity2 of 81Not among the top eight
CrowdStrike2 of 80Not among the top eight
Cyera2 of 80Not among the top eight
Venn2 of 80Not among the top eight
Akamai API Security1 of 81Not among the top eight
Cyberhaven1 of 81Not among the top eight
Palo Alto Networks1 of 81Not among the top eight
42Crunch1 of 80Not among the top eight
Astra1 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Check Point Software. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Check Point Software and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

checkpoint.comYour site7
cyera.com5
venn.com3
csoonline.com2
forcepoint.com2
getastra.com2
hiddenlayer.com2
lakera.ai2
slashdot.org2
akamai.com1

Twenty-one of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Check Point Software came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

checkpoint.com/cyber-hub/tools-vendors/best-ai-security-companies-in-20265
cyera.com/blog/ai-security-platforms5
venn.com/learn/ai-security/ai-security-tools3
cyera.com/blog/best-ai-data-security-platform2
forcepoint.com/blog/insights/ai-security-solutions2
getastra.com/blog/ai-security/ai-security-tools2
hiddenlayer.com/platform/ai-runtime-security2
lakera.ai/2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

checkpoint.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Check Point Software takes 0% of first choices and SentinelOne Singularity takes 11%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “ai security platforms”
5
Organic visits to its site
about 370,648 a month
Searches its site ranks for
39,811 · 1,920 in the top three
Sites linking to it
61,243
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 12 clicks and $255 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
98+ ads · 98 text · 48 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2026, as Check Point SSE Solutions Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 98 in the year. 22 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 88 of 233 in AI security
Segment leader
11%
SentinelOne Singularity
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
8 answers
Its own site cited
in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on checkpoint.com
2,815
subdomains included
Content
1,937
counted in the table below
Documentation
183
Product · Integration
29 · 186
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Glossary or explainer872undatedEmail security, WAF
News or press707undatedEmail security, SASE
Case study234undated
Comparison9402020-09-29EDR, MDR
Conference or event12undated
Blog5undated
Webinar or virtual event5undated
Podcast or video5undatedSASE, Email security
Report or ebook3undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on checkpoint.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page checkpoint.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name email security (31); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Check Point Software

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Check Point Software's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Check Point Software, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Check Point Software by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Check Point Software is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Check Point Software, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at checkpoint.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.