AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Breachsense · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Breachsense

5Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Breachsense was named 1 time in DRP, where UpGuard BreachSight led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In drp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Breachsense for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Digital risk protectionSecurity operations0%42 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Breachsense yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Breachsense across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If your primary concern is credential leaks and dark web exposure → Flare or Breachsense” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DRP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Breachsense, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Breachsense was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recorded Future4 of 51Not among the top eight
ZeroFox3 of 51Not among the top eight
Flare2 of 51Not among the top eight
Group-IB Digital Risk Protection2 of 50Not among the top eight
SOCRadar Extended Threat Intelligence2 of 50Not among the top eight
Bolster1 of 51Not among the top eight
Guardz1 of 51Not among the top eight
Bitsight1 of 50Not among the top eight
BlueVoyant Sky1 of 50Not among the top eight
CTM3601 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Breachsense. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Breachsense and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

breachsense.comYour site5
g2.com4
guideflow.com4
upguard.com3
cybersecuritynews.com2
expertinsights.com2
flare.io2
netcraft.com2
slashdot.org2
agenticindex.io1

Twenty-two of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Breachsense came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on breachsense.com
29,868
subdomains included
Content
271
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog13822026-09-17ASM, Threat intel
Comparison4202026-01-31ASM
Conference or event3622026-07-28
Glossary or explainer3102026-06-29ASM
News or press1002026-06-22
Case study802026-01-22
Report or ebook3undated
Template or tool202026-03-25
Webinar or virtual event112026-09-11

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page breachsense.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Breachsense

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Breachsense is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Real-time data breach and dark web intelligence platform.
For
security teams
Price stated
Pricing scales with the size of your organization and what you need to monitor. breachsense.com
Free plan or trial
Run a free dark web scan to see if your credentials or company data have leaked. breachsense.com
Integrations claimed
10 breachsense.com
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, certifications, hosting, customers

What Breachsense's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: breachsense.com, breachsense.com/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Breachsense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Breachsense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Breachsense by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Breachsense is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Breachsense, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at breachsense.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.