Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 16 of 70
Azure · 1 category · Named, not rankedAzure Database for PostgreSQL
23Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Azure Database for PostgreSQL was named 9 times in Managed databases, where Amazon RDS led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 74
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 82
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise7 of 92
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
In managed databases · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Azure Database for PostgreSQL for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed relational databases | Data platform | 0% | 11 of 82 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Amazon RDS at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Azure Database for PostgreSQL held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Managed databases · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 19 → 12 of 72
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 41 of 81
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed databases | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 11 of 82 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Azure Database for PostgreSQL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Azure Database for PostgreSQL across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels1
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd choose the equivalent managed service if your company already standardizes elsewhere” GPT-6 Luna · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Azure Database for PostgreSQL if you want PostgreSQL on Azure” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“offers zone-redundant high availability and automatic failover” GPT-6 Luna · Managed databases · direct prompt · alternative
“Azure: Azure Database for PostgreSQL” GPT-5.4 mini · Managed databases · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Azure Database for PostgreSQL, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Database for PostgreSQL was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Azure Database for PostgreSQL, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Azure Database for PostgreSQL was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Azure Database for PostgreSQL. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 23 answers that named Azure Database for PostgreSQL and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.microsoft.com12
aws.amazon.com9
cloud.google.com9
docs.aws.amazon.com9
digitalocean.com8
g2.com8
it-ai-index.com8
tech-insider.org8
cloudinsight.cc7
docs.cloud.google.com7
Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Azure Database for PostgreSQL came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Azure Database for PostgreSQL stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Azure Database for PostgreSQL stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 480 a month (“azure database for postgresql”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 26 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on Azure's site (azure.cn), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 11 of 82 in managed databases
Segment leader
45%
Amazon RDS
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 22 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Azure Database for PostgreSQL
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Azure Database for PostgreSQL; a claim can dispute any of them.
Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server 2Azure Database for PostgreSQL / MySQL 1
Follow Azure Database for PostgreSQL
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Azure is the company behind Azure Database for PostgreSQL.ShowHide
The company
Azure is the company behind Azure Database for PostgreSQL.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Azure
- Azure ACR, Azure AD Conditional Access, Azure AD Graph API, Azure AI Document Intelligence, Azure AI Foundry, Azure AI Gateway, Azure AI Search, Azure API Management and 79 more
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Azure Database for PostgreSQL's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Azure Database for PostgreSQL, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Azure Database for PostgreSQL by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Azure Database for PostgreSQL is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Azure Database for PostgreSQL, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.