Every category where a model named Tungsten Automation for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Intelligent document processing	Data platform	0%	21 of 89	25%	12	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tungsten Automation yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tungsten Automation across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pairs document capture with full workflow orchestration for large, complex end-to-end processes.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Document processing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Strong document automation plus enterprise workflow and integration focus.” Perplexity Sonar · Document processing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Complex Documents & Compliance: Tungsten Automation (Kofax)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Document processing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“consider it for complex, established enterprise processes” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex implementations; less flexible when document structures change frequently; requires significant setup time” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative

“customer concerns about slow, complex support, licensing flexibility, inconsistent experiences” GPT-6 Luna · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative

“legacy versions of Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Document processing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tungsten Automation, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tungsten Automation was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UiPath Document Understanding30 of 354Not among the top eight

ABBYY Vantage29 of 3517Not among the top eight

Hyperscience Hypercell23 of 357Not among the top eight

Rossum23 of 351Not among the top eight

Amazon Textract17 of 350Not among the top eight

Google Document AI14 of 350Not among the top eight

Infrrd11 of 350Not among the top eight

Azure AI Document Intelligence10 of 350Not among the top eight

Docsumo9 of 350Not among the top eight

Nanonets8 of 351Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tungsten Automation. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 35 of the 35 answers that named Tungsten Automation and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

llamaindex.ai20

docsumo.com17

abbyy.com16

technovapartners.com15

doxis.com14

gartner.com14

kognitos.com14

lido.app13

flowwright.com12

research.isg-one.com12

147 of the 147 domain citations in answers naming Tungsten Automation came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

llamaindex.ai/insights/best-idp-tools16

docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software14

technovapartners.com/en/insights/best-intelligent-document-processing-software-202614

doxis.com/en/blog/best-idp-software12

grooper.com/blog_posts/intelligent-document-processing-vendors11

raftlabs.com/blog/top-intelligent-document-processing-companies11

research.isg-one.com/buyers-guide/digital_technology/intelligent_document_processing/202411

flowwright.com/blog/8-best-intelligent-document-processing-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

tungstenautomation.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Tungsten Automation takes 0% of first choices and Nanonets takes 32%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “intelligent document processing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “intelligent document processing platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 2,400 a month (“tungsten automation”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 61 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 37,829 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 6,421 · 511 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,512
Paid Google search: 2 searches its ads show for, about 15 clicks and $741 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

120+ ads · 74 image, 46 text · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as Tungsten Automation Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 81 in the year, 39 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 21 of 89 in document processing

Segment leader

32%

Nanonets

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 35 answers
Its own site cited: in 35 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on tungstenautomation.com

9,988

subdomains included

Content

678

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

160 · 25

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	251	12	2026-09-25
Case study	145	undated
Report or ebook	104	undated
Webinar or virtual event	74	10	2026-09-30
News or press	50	3	2026-09-11
Podcast or video	30	undated
Comparison	13	2	2026-09-07
Conference or event	6	4	2026-10-09
Glossary or explainer	5	1	2026-09-09

Most recent

2026-10-09Beyond paper executive luncheon conference or event
2026-10-04Edge conference 2026 conference or event
2026-09-30How to advance from documents to decisions webinar or virtual event
2026-09-25Why ai agents need idp blog
2026-09-24Unlocking microsoft 365 with power pdf and printix webinar or virtual event
2026-09-21Supercharge your microsoft reach unlock productivity with printix and power pdf webinar or virtual event

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page tungstenautomation.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Tungsten Automation

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tungsten Automation; a claim can dispute any of them.

Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) 3Tungsten Automation (Kofax) 2Kofax/Tungsten Automation 1Tungsten Automation / TotalAgility 1

Follow Tungsten Automation

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Tungsten Automation is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: a leading provider of AI-powered workflow automation solutions for global enterprises
tungstenautomation.com
For: global enterprises
tungstenautomation.com
Certifications: NISTHIPAAGDPRSOC 2 Type IIISO 27001:2022SOC 2 Type 1SOC 2 Type 2SOC 3
Hosting: USAIrelandSwedenUKon-premisein the cloud
Customers named: Boston Children’s HospitalBorusanKemiraRoyal Bank of CanadaSCORSudarshan Chemical IndustriesBritish BakelsJungheinrich
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations

What Tungsten Automation's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: tungstenautomation.com, trust.tungstenautomation.com, tungstenautomation.com/products/rpa, tungstenautomation.com/case-studies, tungstenautomation.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tungsten Automation's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tungsten Automation, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Tungsten Automation by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Tungsten Automation is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Tungsten Automation, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.