AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › AWS Kiro · October 2026 Edition
AWS · 1 category · Named, not ranked

AWS Kiro

2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. AWS Kiro was named 1 time in AI coding, where GitHub Copilot led with 75%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai coding · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AWS Kiro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI coding assistantsDeveloper platform0%26 of 480%1under 10 labels · led by GitHub Copilot at 75%goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

Movement

Since September 2026, AWS Kiro held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · AI coding · by segment

Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now.
3%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 4 of 49, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
AI coding0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 31 → 26 of 48

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated AWS Kiro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS Kiro, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS Kiro was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Claude Code2 of 21Not among the top eight
Cursor2 of 21Not among the top eight
GitHub Copilot2 of 20Not among the top eight
Amazon Q Developer1 of 20Not among the top eight
Devin1 of 20Not among the top eight
Google Antigravity1 of 20Not among the top eight
OpenAI Codex1 of 20Not among the top eight
Windsurf1 of 20Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS Kiro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named AWS Kiro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

academy.claude.com1
aiagentsquare.com1
articsledge.com1
artificial-intelligence-wiki.com1
baeseokjae.github.io1
builder.io1
claude.com1
cloudzero.com1
code.claude.com1
codegen.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming AWS Kiro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow AWS Kiro

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AWS is the company behind AWS Kiro.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
一款革命性的 AI 驱动整合开发环境(Agentic IDE)。它是一个完全独立的平台,能通过与您对话,将您的想法直接转化为一个真实、可访问的网站。
Hosting
all regions where AWS Security Agent is supported
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, customers

What AWS Kiro's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: aws.amazon.com/cn/getting-started/hands-on/get-started-with-aws-kiro, aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2026/06/aws-kiro-power-claude-code. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS Kiro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS Kiro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS Kiro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where AWS Kiro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS Kiro, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aws.amazon.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.