Index › Vendors › ARMO Platform · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

ARMO Platform

8Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ARMO Platform was named 7 times in Container security, where Aqua Security led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business30 of 62

under the label threshold

Mid-market10 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In container security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ARMO Platform for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Container and Kubernetes security	Cloud and infrastructure	2%	10 of 78	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Aqua Security at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ARMO Platform yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ARMO Platform across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ARMO Platform is positioned as open-source-first and is a strong low-budget option” GPT-5.4 mini · Container security · budget prompt · first choice

“If your main driver is checking compliance boxes ... Kubescape (managed via the ARMO Platform) is an excellent, cost-effective choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“ARMO Platform (built on Kubescape) offers a free tier for small environments and paid per‑worker‑node tiers.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Container security · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers a highly cost-effective tier to manage Kubescape across your clusters” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Container security · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ARMO Platform, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ARMO Platform was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Falco7 of 82Not in the top three

Kubescape6 of 83Not in the top three

Trivy6 of 81Not in the top three

Sysdig Secure4 of 81Not in the top three

Wiz4 of 81Not in the top three

Aqua Security4 of 80Not in the top three

Sysdig3 of 80Not in the top three

Orca Security2 of 81Not in the top three

SUSE NeuVector2 of 81Not in the top three

Datadog Cloud Security Management2 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ARMO Platform. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 8 answers that named ARMO Platform and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org4

gbhackers.com4

apis.io3

appsecsanta.com3

aws.amazon.com3

cipherssecurity.com3

cybersecuritynews.com3

stackradar.io3

decryptiondigest.com2

g2.com2

No domain is on file for ARMO Platform, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

gbhackers.com/best-kubernetes-security-compared4

apis.io/plans/kubescape/kubescape-plans-pricing3

cipherssecurity.com/best-kubernetes-security-tools-20263

cyberpress.org/kubernetes-security-by-business-size-23

appsecsanta.com/container-security-tools/kubernetes-security-tools2

aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-vudcbfxavxlrg2

cybersecuritynews.com/best-kubernetes-security-tools2

decryptiondigest.com/blog/aqua-security-vs-sysdig-container-security2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ARMO Platform

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ARMO Platform; a claim can dispute any of them.

ARMO (Kubescape) 1ARMO Platform / Kubescape 1ARMO's platform 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ARMO Platform's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ARMO Platform, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.