AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Archive Intel · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Archive Intel

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Archive Intel was named 2 times in Comms archiving, where Smarsh Enterprise Archive led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In comms archiving · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Archive Intel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Communications archiving and complianceSecurity operations0%25 of 1010%2under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Archive Intel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Archive Intel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other budget-friendly options include Archive Intel, which is designed for simplicity” Mistral Small · Comms archiving · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for: Smaller firms and RIAs needing affordable compliance” Kimi K2 · Comms archiving · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Archive Intel, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Archive Intel was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smarsh Enterprise Archive5 of 62Not among the top eight
Jatheon5 of 61Not among the top eight
Google Vault4 of 62Not among the top eight
Global Relay4 of 60Not among the top eight
Mimecast Cloud Archive3 of 60Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Enterprise Archive3 of 60Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview2 of 60Not among the top eight
MailStore Server1 of 61Not among the top eight
Microsoft 365 audit logging1 of 61Not among the top eight
Archon1 of 60Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Archive Intel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 6 answers that named Archive Intel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jatheon.com5
zipdo.co5
f6s.com4
gartner.com4
archiveintel.comYour site3
smarsh.com3
us.fitgap.com3
wifitalents.com3
worldmetrics.org3
dataintelo.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Archive Intel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on archiveintel.com
40
subdomains included
Content
11
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1102026-03-25

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page archiveintel.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Archive Intel

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Archive Intel is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Communications archiving and supervision platform for SEC and FINRA regulated firms.
For
SEC and FINRA regulated firms
Price stated
Per-seat, per-connector pricing archiveintel.com
Starting price
99 archiveintel.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type II CertifiedOfficial LinkedIn Regulatory Compliance Partner
Customers named
Great Point CapitalRora Wealth11 FinancialFin.LinkRossby FinancialRoyal Park Partners
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Archive Intel's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: archiveintel.com, archiveintel.com/pricing, archiveintel.com/trust. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Archive Intel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Archive Intel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Archive Intel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Archive Intel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Archive Intel, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at archiveintel.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.