IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Appgate SDP · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Appgate SDP

11Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Appgate SDP was named 8 times in ZTNA, where Cloudflare One led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ztna · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Appgate SDP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Zero trust network accessNetwork and edge0%15 of 710%8under 10 labels · led by Cloudflare One at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Appgate SDP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Appgate SDP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Granular access policies; strong for complex environments with many private applications” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ZTNA · comparative prompt · alternative
“For identity-centric or hybrid cloud, Okta Access Gateway and Appgate SDP are notable.” Mistral Small · ZTNA · comparative prompt · alternative
“For Security-First Organizations: Zscaler or Appgate SDP” Kimi K2 · ZTNA · comparative prompt · alternative
“Appgate SDP offers the best free tier among ZTNA tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ZTNA · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Appgate SDP, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Appgate SDP was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zscaler Private Access10 of 118Not in the top three
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access10 of 110Not in the top three
Netskope Private Access9 of 111Not in the top three
Twingate8 of 112Not in the top three
Cisco Secure Access8 of 110Not in the top three
Tailscale5 of 111Not in the top three
Akamai Enterprise Application Access5 of 110Not in the top three
Cloudflare Access5 of 110Not in the top three
NordLayer5 of 110Not in the top three
Cloudflare One4 of 112Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Appgate SDP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Appgate SDP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aimultiple.com11
akamai.com7
seanfraser.io7
sf-cdn.iansresearch.com7
cybersecuritynews.com6
worldmetrics.org6
cipherssecurity.com5
expertinsights.com5
guptadeepak.com5
peerspot.com4

Sixty-three of the sixty-three domain citations in answers naming Appgate SDP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Appgate SDP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Appgate SDP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at appgate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack