IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › API7 Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

API7 Enterprise

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. API7 Enterprise was named 3 times in API management and 1 other category, where Kong Gateway led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market20 of 55

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named API7 Enterprise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
API management	Developer platform	0%	20 of 55	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%
API gateways	Developer platform	0%	28 of 51	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 61%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for API7 Enterprise yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated API7 Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as API7 Enterprise, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and API7 Enterprise was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kong Gateway4 of 41Not in the top three

Amazon API Gateway4 of 40Not in the top three

Apigee4 of 40Not in the top three

Azure API Management4 of 40Not in the top three

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform4 of 40Not in the top three

Tyk4 of 40Not in the top three

Gravitee3 of 40Not in the top three

IBM API Connect2 of 40Not in the top three

Zuplo2 of 40Not in the top three

Alibaba Cloud1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named API7 Enterprise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named API7 Enterprise and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

api7.ai4

digitalapi.ai3

zuplo.com3

checkthat.ai2

guptadeepak.com2

moesif.com2

6sense.com1

apigatewaycost.com1

apix-drive.com1

aws.amazon.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming API7 Enterprise came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

api7.ai/api-gateway-comparison2

api7.ai/top-11-api-gateways-platforms-compared2

api7.ai/top-5-api-management-comparison2

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-api-management-service-platforms2

digitalapi.ai/blogs/best-api-gateway2

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-api-management-platforms-20262

moesif.com/blog/technical/api-development/Top-API-Managers2

zuplo.com/learning-center/best-api-gateways-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as API7 Enterprise

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as API7 Enterprise; a claim can dispute any of them.

API7 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when API7 Enterprise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as API7 Enterprise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at api7.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.