AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Apache Superset · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Apache Superset

18Judge labels
2First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Embedded analytics for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 72 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Apache Superset →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In embedded analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Apache Superset for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Embedded analyticsData platform2%11 of 7220%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Apache Superset yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Apache Superset across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you hit their pricing limits and have engineering capacity, move to Apache Superset.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · first choice
“Apache Superset is the lower-license-cost alternative” GPT-6 Luna · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · alternative
“Apache Superset is a free SQL-native alternative” Muse Glimmer 30B · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · alternative
“Open-source options (Metabase is open-core).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Embedded analytics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“free options, but embedding typically requires paid tiers or significant engineering work to white-label properly” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · soft negative
“it has a steeper learning curve to deploy and configure than Metabase” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Embedded analytics · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Apache Superset, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Apache Superset was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Looker7 of 181Not among the top eight
Zoho Analytics7 of 180Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI Embedded6 of 181Not among the top eight
Tableau6 of 180Not among the top eight
Draxlr4 of 183Not among the top eight
Amazon QuickSight4 of 180Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Apache Superset. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named Apache Superset and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

holistics.io10
luzmo.com7
embeddable.com6
explo.co6
draxlr.com5
metabase.com5
peliqan.io5
querio.ai5
zoho.com5
domo.com4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Apache Superset came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

apache.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Apache Superset takes 2% of first choices and Metabase takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “embedded analytics platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “embedded analytics platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
3,600 a month (“apache superset”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
93 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,144,025 a month
Searches its site ranks for
44,247 · 10,306 in the top three
Sites linking to it
174,267
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as GridGain Systems, verified. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 72 in embedded analytics
Segment leader
22%
Metabase
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
18 answers
Its own site cited
in 16 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on apache.org
2,858
subdomains included
Content
1,384
counted in the table below
Documentation
375
Product · Integration
16 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,081122026-09-03
Blog22812026-07-01
Template or tool38undated
Report or ebook14undated
Conference or event1002026-06-09
Glossary or explainer9undated
Case study2undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page apache.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Apache Superset

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Apache Superset's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Apache Superset, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Apache Superset by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Apache Superset is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Apache Superset, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at apache.org is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.