IT AI Index

Index › Products › Anthropic · October 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Anthropic

11Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

3Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Anthropic was named 4 times in AI security and 2 other categories, where SentinelOne Singularity led with 11%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business53 of 147

under the label threshold

Mid-market228 of 233

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In ai security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Anthropic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI security platforms	Security operations	0%	228 of 233	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11%
Enterprise AI assistants	Data platform	0%	96 of 145	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25%
ML platforms	Data platform	0%	87 of 107	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Azure Machine Learning at 21%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Anthropic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Anthropic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Major AI platforms like OpenAI, Google (DeepMind, Gemini), Anthropic, Meta, and Microsoft have experienced data leaks and security incidents” Mistral Small · AI security · negative prompt · soft negative

“even leading AI platforms from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic contain exploitable security vulnerabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI security · negative prompt · soft negative

“Highly Volatile Proprietary Foundation Model APIs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ML platforms · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Anthropic, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Anthropic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OpenAI8 of 110Not among the top eight

Google Cloud4 of 110Not among the top eight

Microsoft 365 Copilot3 of 112Not among the top eight

Amazon SageMaker3 of 110Not among the top eight

Amazon Bedrock2 of 110Not among the top eight

Amazon Q2 of 110Not among the top eight

Azure Machine Learning2 of 110Not among the top eight

ChatGPT2 of 110Not among the top eight

Claude2 of 110Not among the top eight

Claude Code2 of 110Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Anthropic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 11 answers that named Anthropic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

journals.calstate.edu3

learn.microsoft.com3

reddit.com3

checkpoint.com2

genai.owasp.org2

labs.cloudsecurityalliance.org2

medium.com2

abcnews.com1

acronis.com1

anaconda.com1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Anthropic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

journals.calstate.edu/ai-edu/article/download/5444/4390/166763

abcnews.com/US/wireStory/timeline-developments-ai-safety-attack-hugging-face-1368886941

acronis.com/en/blog/posts/best-ai-security-tools-smb1

anaconda.com/guides/machine-learning-software1

anonyome.com/knowledge-center/ai-privacy1

aona.ai/resources/templates/ai-security-audit-checklist1

apptension.com/blog-posts/no-code-and-low-code-limitations1

articsledge.com/post/machine-learning-platforms-comparison-azure-ai-vs-aws-sagemaker-vs-go1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

anthropic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Anthropic takes 0% of first choices and SentinelOne Singularity takes 11%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai security platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “ai security platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Organic visits to its site: about 2,657,653 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 43,367 · 4,081 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 107,239
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

3 ads · 3 video · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2026, as Anthropic, PBC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 3 in the year. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 228 of 233 in AI security

Segment leader

11%

SentinelOne Singularity

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 11 answers
Its own site cited: in 10 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on anthropic.com

572

subdomains included

Content

467

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

9 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
News or press	259	14	2026-09-23
Report or ebook	167	9	2026-09-25
Conference or event	19	0	2023-11-01
Webinar or virtual event	14	undated
Blog	8	1	2026-08-25

Most recent

2026-09-25Claude computes a nine-loop amplitude in N=4 super-Yang-Mills report or ebook
2026-09-24Project Swap: What happens when agents trade for us? report or ebook
2026-09-23Claude discovers a novel enzyme system news or press
2026-09-18Partnering with Accenture on embedded evaluation news or press
2026-09-17Introducing the Life Sciences Verification Program news or press
2026-09-17How Claude is uplifting biomolecular modeling report or ebook

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page anthropic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Anthropic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Anthropic; a claim can dispute any of them.

Anthropic (Claude) 1

Follow Anthropic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Anthropic is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Anthropic is an AI safety and research company that's working to build reliable, interpretable, and steerable AI systems.
anthropic.com
For: Customers seeking compliance artifacts, request documentation, and high-level details on controls Anthropic adheres to.
trust.anthropic.com
Certifications: SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022ISO/IEC 42001:2023FedRAMP HighUK Cyber Essentials
Hosting: WorldwideWorldwide (Local to Customer)
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What Anthropic's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: anthropic.com, trust.anthropic.com, anthropic.com/product/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Anthropic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Anthropic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Anthropic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Anthropic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Anthropic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.