| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artifact and container registries | Developer platform | 10% | 3 of 89 | 0% | 15 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“2. Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR) - a fully-managed Docker container registry that makes it easy for developers to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images.” Llama 4 Maverick · Artifact registries · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For most mid-sized B2B companies, Amazon ECR is the top recommendation due to its scalability, security, and AWS ecosystem integration.” Mistral Small · Artifact registries · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For 90% of mid-sized B2B companies, Amazon ECR or Google Artifact Registry is the safest, most secure, and most scalable bet.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Artifact registries · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Tier 1 (Trusted): Enterprise Private Registries (AWS ECR, Google GCR/AAR, Azure ACR) configured with RBAC and Scanning.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Artifact registries · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 34 answers that named Amazon Elastic Container Registry and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming Amazon Elastic Container Registry came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amazon Elastic Container Registry's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Amazon Elastic Container Registry by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Amazon Elastic Container Registry is among the products AI models recommend first in Artifact and container registries this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.