AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Developer platform › Artifact registries › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Artifact and container registries for enterprise buyers

Asked as “artifact repository”, and as “container registry”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 68 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Contested · Sonatype Nexus Repository 21%
40JFrog Artifactory21Sonatype Nexus Repository07Azure Container Registry32others

40% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01JFrog Artifactory40%14%65endorsed leader
02Sonatype Nexus Repository21%5%41accepted challenger
03Azure Container Registry7%19%31accepted challenger
04Google Artifact Registry Lab in the set4%15%40accepted challenger
05Amazon Elastic Container Registry4%21%14accepted challenger
06Harbor1%3%33accepted challenger
07AWS ECR1%0%10accepted challenger
08Azure Artifacts1%8%13accepted challenger
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13Docker Hub0%82%17criticized challenger
12GitHub Packages0%43%23criticized challenger
11Sonatype Lifecycle0%20%10accepted challenger
10AWS CodeArtifact0%19%21accepted challenger
09Cloudsmith0%14%22accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Artifact Registry is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models three times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
A03
G04
A05
06
A07
A08
09
A10
11
G12
13
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01JFrog Artifactory40%
02Sonatype Nexus Repository21%
03Azure Container Registry7%
04Google Artifact Registry4%
05Amazon Elastic Container Registry4%
06Harbor1%
07AWS ECR1%
08Azure Artifacts1%
09Cloudsmith0%
10AWS CodeArtifact0%
11Sonatype Lifecycle0%
12GitHub Packages0%
13Docker Hub0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Docker Hub
82%
14 of 17 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Practical enterprise guidance is therefore to avoid direct production pulls from Docker Hub / GitHub Container Registry public images and any other public source.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
JFrog Artifactory
14%
9 of 65 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“JFrog Artifactory (the market leader) is actually a poor fit for your requirement” MiniMax M2.5, budget prompt
GitHub Packages
43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“avoid direct production pulls from Docker Hub / GitHub Container Registry public images and any other public source” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Azure Container Registry
19%
6 of 31 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Container Registry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network... Score: 10 Critical” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1118 links across 250 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

vendor site · JFrog41 answers · 84 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Sonatype37 answers · 95 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Harness27 answers · 47 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Safeguard17 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Railway17 answers · 17 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CloudRepo16 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G215 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “artifact and container registries”, “artifact repository”, “best artifact repository”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
JFrog Artifactory jfrog.com
JFrog Artifactory 40%, JFrog Artifactory / JFrog Container Registry 3%, JFrog Artifactory Enterprise X / Enterprise+ 3%, JFrog Container Registry 1%
47%1362,90017238,697$371201
Sonatype sonatype.com
Sonatype Nexus Repository 21%, Sonatype Lifecycle 0%
21%1217203871,814 company$1,87975
Azure Container Registry7%301,00047,904
Amazon parent site
Amazon Elastic Container Registry 4%, Amazon ECR 1%
6%29151,000,0001,380,939
Google Cloud parent site
Google Artifact Registry 4%
4%99165,0007,596
Harbor goharbor.io1%11674,000331,9183,420
AWS parent site
AWS ECR 1%, AWS CodeArtifact 0%
1%47368,000114,001
Azure Artifacts1%301,00047,904
CloudRepo cloudrepo.io1%17200707
Artifactory1%8,100575

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (harness.io, itechguides.com, jfrog.com, sonatype.com). The first result for “artifact and container registries” is docs.cloud.google.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best artifact repository for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which container registry would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade artifact and container registries and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best artifact repository for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an artifact repository. What should we look at?”Negative“Which artifact and container registries should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Microsoft Azure Artifacts
JFrog ArtifactoryChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Google Artifact Registry, Microsoft Azure Container Registry
against: Docker Hub
no first choiceSonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudRepo
against: JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
GPT-5.4 miniJFrog Artifactory
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesHarbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub
JFrog Artifactory Enterprise X / Enterprise+
One alternativeAWS CodeArtifact
against: Sonatype Nexus Repository
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashJFrog Artifactory
Seven alternativesAWS, Azure, Cloudsmith, GCP, GitHub, GitLab Packages, Sonatype Lifecycle
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, JFrog ArtifactoryChanged
Five alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub
JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesCloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, GitLab Container/Dependency Registry
JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesCloudRepo, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry, Inedo ProGet
against: AWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, Sonatype Cloud, Sonatype Lifecycle
GitHub, GitLab Ultimate
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
against: Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Public Docker Hub, PyPI, public npm
Perplexity SonarJFrog Artifactory
One alternativeSonatype Nexus Repository
Azure Container Registry, JFrog ArtifactoryChanged
Two alternativesHarbor, Mirantis Secure Registry
JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAzure Artifacts, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Verdaccio
Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudRepo
against: JFrog Artifactory
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastJFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog ArtifactoryHeld
Five alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Red Hat Quay
against: Docker Hub
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Six alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Inedo ProGet, Red Hat Quay
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repositoryagainst: AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact RegistryJFrog Artifactory
Seven alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Quay, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: AWS ECR Public, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry
Mistral SmallJFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus RepositoryAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
Three alternativesDocker Hub, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Artifacts, Azure Container Registry, Harbor
JFrog Artifactoryagainst: CloudRepono first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashJFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudsmith
HarborChanged
Two alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Red Hat Quay
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesCloudRepo, Cloudsmith
against: Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Artifactory
Five alternativesArtifact Registry, Azure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, CodeArtifact, Nexus
against: CoreOS Quay, Docker Hub, GHCR, Google Container Registry, Helm's old ChartMuseum, Maven Central, Portus / ClearContainer registries, PyPI, Quay.io, crates.io, npm
Llama 4 MaverickAzure Artifacts
One alternativePackagecloud
Amazon Elastic Container RegistryChanged
Two alternativesCloudsmith, Docker Hub
Artifactory
One alternativeGoogle Artifact Registry
CloudRepo, JFrog ArtifactorySecureStor
Two alternativesJFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Amazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
Qwen 3.7 FlashJFrog Artifactory
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, Sonatype Lifecycle
VMware Tanzu Registry ServicesChanged
Four alternativesACR, ECR, GCR, JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
against: Docker Hub
JFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesGitHub Packages, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Cloud Storage
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub Public, GitHub Packages, Maven Central, NuGet, PyPI, npm
Kimi K2JFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesCloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
JFrog Artifactory / JFrog Container RegistryChanged
Four alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
JFrog Artifactory
Six alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeHarbor
against: GitHub Packages, GitLab, JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesCloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: GitHub Packages
against: Docker Hub, Google Container Registry
GLM 4.7 FlashXJFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudsmith
JFrog ArtifactoryChanged
Four alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
JFrog Artifactory
Six alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAzure Artifacts, Cloudsmith, JFrog Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Container Registry, JFrog Artifactory
MiniMax M2.5JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus RepositoryJFrog Container RegistryChanged
Three alternativesDocker Trusted Registry, Mirantis Secure Registry, Red Hat Quay
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Five alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor
against: Cloudsmith
Inedo ProGetagainst: AWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype LifecycleJFrog Artifactory Enterprise X / Enterprise+, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry
against: Docker Hub
GPT-6 LunaJFrog Artifactory
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact RegistryChanged
One alternativeJFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory
Seven alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Red Hat Quay, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: GitLab Package and Container Registry
JFrog Artifactory
One alternativeSonatype Lifecycle
against: AWS CodeArtifact
JFrog Artifactory
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Google Container Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Muse Glimmer 30BSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactory / JFrog Container RegistryChanged
Four alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Harbor, Mirantis Secure Registry
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, ECR, Azure Container Registry, ACR, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Sonatype Nexus Repository
One alternativeCloudRepo
against: JFrog Artifactory
JFrog Artifactoryagainst: Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:31yes98 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:59yes46 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:03yes1027 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:11yes162 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:16yes2511 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:06yes128 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:18yes2240 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:09yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:04no024 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:06yes1921 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:07yes2135 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:05yes519 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:32yes413 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:40yes1419 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:33no06 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:57no03 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:33no014 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:50yes173 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:52yes2250 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:15no06 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:38yes2138 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 22:49yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:33no027 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:37yes1919 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:51yes2349 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:55yes539 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 22:54yes210 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:38yes1421 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 23:55yes1412 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:54yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 00:37yes2239 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:32yes154 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 22:37yes2012 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:41yes109 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:31yes2066 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:38yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:26yes1342 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:44yes1734 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:18yes21113 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:11yes1421 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:42yes831 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:52yes2337 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:56yes168 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:45yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:41yes1931 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:47yes172 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:21yes2412 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:56yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:48yes2374 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:02yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:29no026 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:47yes2064 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:00yes2337 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:56yes2163 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:03yes219 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:25yes2031 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:57yes1812 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:25no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:33no018 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 01:01yes174 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:23yes1910 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:46no011 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:43yes2341 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:38yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-04 23:33yes1040 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:41yes2433 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 00:01yes2043 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:06yes1525 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:23yes428 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:36yes2332 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:49yes2612 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:51yes65 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:16yes1626 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:20yes184 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:03yes2411 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:37yes523 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:54yes2591 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:21yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:06yes1524 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:31yes2433 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:56yes25162 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 00:26yes2475 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:42yes524 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:02yes2339 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR) read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
Azure ACR read as Azure Container Registry
GitHub Container Registry read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (ghcr.io) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages/GHCR read as GitHub Packages
JFrog read as JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype read as Sonatype Lifecycle
Unresolved, counted raw
8gears
AWS ECR Public
Alibaba Cloud Container Registry (ACR)
Amazon Elastic Container Registry, ECR
Azure Container Registry, ACR
Cloud Storage (S3/Blob)
CoreOS Quay
Docker Hub Public
Docker Trusted Registry (DTR)
GitLab Container/Dependency Registry
GitLab Package and Container Registry
Google Container Registry legacy
Harbor-based Managed Services
Helm's old ChartMuseum
Iron Bank
Microsoft Azure Artifacts
Microsoft Azure Container Registry
Portus / ClearContainer registries
Public Docker Hub
SecureStor
Sonatype Cloud
Sonatype Nexus Firewall
VMware Tanzu Harbor
VMware Tanzu Registry Services (powered by Harbor)
crates.io
public npm
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← App shieldingCI/CD →