| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artifact and container registries | Developer platform | 11% | 2 of 89 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Enterprise-grade artifact repository manager that allows development teams to store, organize, and distribute software components... Both are viable for a 500-person company.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Artifact registries · scale prompt · first choice
“the best artifact repository for a company with a limited budget is Sonatype Nexus Repository (Community Edition)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Artifact registries · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Sonatype Nexus Repository Pro is the strongest all-around recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Artifact registries · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd recommend Sonatype Nexus Repository Pro” MiniMax M2.5 · Artifact registries · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Limited integrations vs. leaders; self-host adds ops overhead.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Artifact registries · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 75 answers that named Sonatype Nexus Repository and are not a share of its labels.
233 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming Sonatype Nexus Repository came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Sonatype Nexus Repository's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository, help.sonatype.com/en/sonatype-nexus-repository.html, sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository/quote, sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository/download, sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository/premium-quote. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sonatype Nexus Repository's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sonatype Nexus Repository, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sonatype Nexus Repository by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Sonatype Nexus Repository is among the products AI models recommend first in Artifact and container registries this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.