IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Activepieces · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Activepieces

11Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Activepieces was named 3 times in Orchestration and 1 other category, where Prefect led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market26 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprise34 of 89

under the label threshold

In orchestration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Activepieces for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow orchestration	Data platform	0%	26 of 86	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Prefect at 24%
API management	Developer platform	0%	21 of 55	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Activepieces yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Activepieces across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Need flexibility and low entry cost? Try free-tier platforms like Activepieces or Integrately” Claude Haiku 4.5 · API management · budget prompt · alternative

“Non‑technical / Business users → n8n (self‑hosted) or Activepieces.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Orchestration · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Activepieces, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Activepieces was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

n8n10 of 115Not in the top three

Zapier8 of 112Not in the top three

Apache Airflow7 of 110Not in the top three

Prefect6 of 112Not in the top three

Make6 of 111Not in the top three

Temporal4 of 110Not in the top three

Windmill4 of 110Not in the top three

Argo Workflows3 of 110Not in the top three

Dagster3 of 110Not in the top three

Kestra3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Activepieces. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 11 answers that named Activepieces and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wrike.com6

zapier.com6

activepieces.comYour site5

automationatlas.io4

teamwork.com4

founding.dev3

software.reibuys.com3

airbyte.com2

blog.n8n.io2

elementum.ai2

Thirty-two of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Activepieces came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wrike.com/workflow-guide/workflow-orchestration-tools6

zapier.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools6

teamwork.com/blog/workflow-orchestration-tools4

founding.dev/blog/open-source-workflow-automation-tools3

software.reibuys.com/workflow-orchestration-software-complete-buyers-guide-20243

activepieces.com/blog/top-10-open-source-workflow-automation-tools-in-20242

airbyte.com/top-etl-tools-for-sources/data-orchestration-tools2

automationatlas.io/answers/best-process-orchestration-tools-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Activepieces's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Activepieces, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at activepieces.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.