AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › DEX › Uniswap vs Jupiter
Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition

Uniswap vs Jupiter

Two of fourteen models named Uniswap first on the direct prompt; zero named Jupiter. Uniswap was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Jupiter by nine and Uniswap carries 38 labels and Jupiter 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Uniswap

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Jupiter

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3815A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Uniswap reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs Uniswap · ControlUp vs Jupiter · PancakeSwap vs Uniswap

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UniswapFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJupiter
Direct201 against Uniswap
Paraphrase00
Comparative110
Budget-constrained011 against Uniswap
Scale-constrained001 against Uniswap
Negative411 against Uniswap
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Uniswap and Jupiter were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 95 answers naming Uniswap and the 30 naming Jupiter. In those answers Jupiter took the first choice two times and Uniswap ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Uniswap and Jupiter stood in it.
ModelDirectJUParaphraseJUComparativeJUBudget-constrainedJUScale-constrainedJUNegativeJU
Claude Haiku 4.5JU
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 FlashJUJU
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 FastJU
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 FlashJUJU
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 FlashJUJUJU
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashXJU
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
UniswapJU Jupiter first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Uniswap on the left and Jupiter on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Uniswap and Jupiter stood in it.

Uniswap first, Jupiter not the choice

2 of 14 modelsJupiter was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX
Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX
Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX
Perplexity SonarControlUp
Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify
Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity
GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity
MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity
GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity
Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Uniswap leads by eleven points.
Uniswap14%#1 of 9
Jupiter4%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Uniswap leads by two points.
Uniswap4%#4 of 12
Jupiter2%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Uniswap0%#7 of 7
Jupiter0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Uniswap

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“you should generally avoid single-pool retail DEXs (like Uniswap) to prevent high slippage and front-running” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Projects can launch on platforms like Uniswap or PancakeSwap without rigorous vetting, developers can remain completely anonymous” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“rather than "raw" MetaMask-to-Uniswap” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Uniswap – Best Overall / Ethereum DeFi leader. Uniswap V3+V4 is the largest DEX by market share and 30-day spot volume.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Uniswap leads spot trading at approximately $73 billion in 30-day volume across its multi-chain deployment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jupiter

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute cheapest per‑transaction fees → Solana DEXs (Raydium, Jupiter, Orca).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.