Index › IT operations and endpoint › DEX › 1inch vs Jupiter

Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition

1inch vs Jupiter

Zero of fourteen models named 1inch first on the direct prompt; zero named Jupiter. 1inch was named by ten of the fourteen models and Jupiter by nine and 1inch carries 17 labels and Jupiter 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

1inch

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Jupiter

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels1715A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, 1inch reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs 1inch · ControlUp vs Jupiter · PancakeSwap vs 1inch

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

1inchFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJupiter

Direct00

Paraphrase00

Comparative00

Budget-constrained21

Scale-constrained00

Negative11

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, 1inch and Jupiter were named in the same answer seventeen times, of the 42 answers naming 1inch and the 30 naming Jupiter. In those answers Jupiter took the first choice one time and 1inch two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where 1inch and Jupiter stood in it.

Model	DirectJU	ComparativeJU	Budget-constrainedJU	NegativeJU
Claude Haiku 4.5		JU
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash		JU	JU
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast				JU
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash	JU	JU
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash		JU	JU	JU
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX			JU
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

1inchJU Jupiter

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, 1inch on the left and Jupiter on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where 1inch and Jupiter stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX

GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX

Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX

Perplexity SonarControlUp

Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room

Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange

Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify

Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity

GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity

MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity

GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity

Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Level: the same share of first choices.

1inch#3 of 9

Jupiter#4 of 9

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

1inch leads by two points.

1inch#5 of 12

Jupiter#6 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

1inch#– of 7

Jupiter#– of 7

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about 1inch

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“For the most budget-conscious company, 1inch is the best platform to use because it charges no protocol fee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“Stick to well-established platforms like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, or 1inch for everyday trading.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“1inch – regularly highlighted as best for low fees.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jupiter

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“For the absolute cheapest per‑transaction fees → Solana DEXs (Raydium, Jupiter, Orca).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative

Also compared

ControlUp vs 1inch ControlUp vs Jupiter PancakeSwap vs 1inch PancakeSwap vs Jupiter Nexthink Infinity vs 1inch Nexthink Infinity vs Jupiter Uniswap vs 1inch Uniswap vs Jupiter 1inch vs Curve 1inch vs Raydium Jupiter vs Curve Jupiter vs Raydium All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.