Index › IT operations and endpoint › DEX › Jupiter vs Raydium

Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition

Jupiter vs Raydium

Zero of fourteen models named Jupiter first on the direct prompt; zero named Raydium. Jupiter was named by nine of the fourteen models and Raydium by ten and Jupiter carries 15 labels and Raydium 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Jupiter

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Raydium

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels1514A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jupiter reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs Jupiter · ControlUp vs Raydium · PancakeSwap vs Jupiter

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

JupiterFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRaydium

Direct00

Paraphrase00

Comparative00

Budget-constrained111 against Raydium

Scale-constrained00

Negative113 against Raydium

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Jupiter and Raydium were named in the same answer twelve times, of the 30 answers naming Jupiter and the 25 naming Raydium. In those answers Raydium took the first choice zero times and Jupiter one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jupiter and Raydium stood in it.

Model	DirectJURA	ComparativeJURA	Budget-constrainedJURA	NegativeJURA
Claude Haiku 4.5		JU	RA
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash		JURA	JU
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast		RA		JURA
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash	JU	JU		RA
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash		JU	JURA	JURA
Kimi K2				RA
GLM 4.7 FlashX			JURA
MiniMax M2.5			RA
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

JU JupiterRA RaydiumJU first choiceJU named as an alternativeJU argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jupiter on the left and Raydium on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jupiter and Raydium stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX

GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX

Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX

Perplexity SonarControlUp

Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room

Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange

Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify

Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity

GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity

MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity

GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity

Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Jupiter leads by four points.

Jupiter#4 of 9

Raydium#– of 9

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Level: the same share of first choices.

Jupiter#6 of 12

Raydium#8 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

Jupiter#– of 7

Raydium#– of 7

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Jupiter

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“For the absolute cheapest per‑transaction fees → Solana DEXs (Raydium, Jupiter, Orca).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Raydium

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Raydium: ~93% of liquidity pools exhibit rug pull patterns” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative

“up to 93% of its ~388,000 analyzed liquidity pools were flagged as suspected rug pulls” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative

“Ultra‑cheap, but development environment is different (Rust) & tooling less EVM‑like” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative

“Best for Ultra-Low Fees & Speed: Solana Ecosystem ... Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“Raydium offers fast execution and low transaction costs of fractions of a cent on Solana, combined with deep liquidity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative

Also compared

ControlUp vs Jupiter ControlUp vs Raydium PancakeSwap vs Jupiter PancakeSwap vs Raydium Nexthink Infinity vs Jupiter Nexthink Infinity vs Raydium Uniswap vs Jupiter Uniswap vs Raydium 1inch vs Jupiter 1inch vs Raydium Jupiter vs Curve Curve vs Raydium All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.