Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition
ControlUp vs Jupiter
Six of fourteen models named ControlUp first on the direct prompt; zero named Jupiter. ControlUp was named by nine of the fourteen models and Jupiter by nine and ControlUp carries 13 labels and Jupiter 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Jupiter
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate8%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1315A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, ControlUp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs PancakeSwap · ControlUp vs Nexthink Infinity · ControlUp vs Uniswap
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ControlUpFirst choices, of fourteen modelsJupiterDirect60
Paraphrase101 against ControlUp
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative01
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where ControlUp and Jupiter stood in it.
| Model | DirectJU | ParaphraseJU | ComparativeJU | Budget-constrainedJU | Scale-constrainedJU | NegativeJU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | JU | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | JU | JU | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | JU | ||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | JU | | JU | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | JU | JU | JU | |||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | JU | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
ControlUpJU Jupiter first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ControlUp on the left and Jupiter on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where ControlUp and Jupiter stood in it.
ControlUp first, Jupiter not the choice
6 of 14 modelsJupiter was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX
Perplexity SonarControlUp
Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity
GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity
MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity
GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap
Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX
GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX
Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room
Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify
Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
ControlUp4%#5 of 9Jupiter4%#4 of 9
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
ControlUp leads by twelve points.
ControlUp13%#1 of 12Jupiter2%#6 of 12
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
ControlUp0%#4 of 7Jupiter0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about ControlUp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“if your employees use standard laptops with SaaS apps, it's less relevant” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“the strongest fit from the results is ControlUp because it is explicitly described as best for mid-market fleets (50–5,000 devices)” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“For mid-market specifically, ControlUp and Nexthink are often recommended due to their scalability and comprehensive feature sets.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Mid-Market: ControlUp ... widely considered the strongest DEX platform for mid-market IT teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Jupiter
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute cheapest per‑transaction fees → Solana DEXs (Raydium, Jupiter, Orca).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
ControlUp vs PancakeSwapControlUp vs Nexthink InfinityControlUp vs UniswapControlUp vs 1inchControlUp vs CurveControlUp vs RaydiumPancakeSwap vs JupiterNexthink Infinity vs JupiterUniswap vs Jupiter1inch vs JupiterJupiter vs CurveJupiter vs RaydiumAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.