Index › IT operations and endpoint › DEX › Uniswap vs Raydium

Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition

Uniswap vs Raydium

Two of fourteen models named Uniswap first on the direct prompt; zero named Raydium. Uniswap was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Raydium by ten and Uniswap carries 38 labels and Raydium 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Uniswap

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Raydium

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate11%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#4#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels3814A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Uniswap reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs Uniswap · ControlUp vs Raydium · PancakeSwap vs Uniswap

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

UniswapFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRaydium

Direct201 against Uniswap

Paraphrase00

Comparative110

Budget-constrained011 against Uniswap · 1 against Raydium

Scale-constrained001 against Uniswap

Negative411 against Uniswap · 3 against Raydium

Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Uniswap and Raydium were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 95 answers naming Uniswap and the 25 naming Raydium. In those answers Raydium took the first choice one time and Uniswap eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Uniswap and Raydium stood in it.

Model	ComparativeRA	Budget-constrainedRA	NegativeRA
Claude Haiku 4.5		RA
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash	RA
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast	RA		RA
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash			RA
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash		RA	RA
Kimi K2			RA
GLM 4.7 FlashX		RA
MiniMax M2.5		RA
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B

UniswapRA Raydium

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Uniswap on the left and Raydium on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Uniswap and Raydium stood in it.

Uniswap first, Raydium not the choice

2 of 14 modelsRaydium was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX

Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX

Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX

Perplexity SonarControlUp

Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room

Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify

Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity

GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity

MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity

GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity

Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Uniswap leads by fourteen points.

Uniswap#1 of 9

Raydium#– of 9

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Uniswap leads by two points.

Uniswap#4 of 12

Raydium#8 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Level: the same share of first choices.

Uniswap#7 of 7

Raydium#– of 7

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Uniswap

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“you should generally avoid single-pool retail DEXs (like Uniswap) to prevent high slippage and front-running” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative

“Projects can launch on platforms like Uniswap or PancakeSwap without rigorous vetting, developers can remain completely anonymous” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative

“rather than "raw" MetaMask-to-Uniswap” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative

“Uniswap – Best Overall / Ethereum DeFi leader. Uniswap V3+V4 is the largest DEX by market share and 30-day spot volume.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“Uniswap leads spot trading at approximately $73 billion in 30-day volume across its multi-chain deployment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Raydium

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Raydium: ~93% of liquidity pools exhibit rug pull patterns” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative

“up to 93% of its ~388,000 analyzed liquidity pools were flagged as suspected rug pulls” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative

“Ultra‑cheap, but development environment is different (Rust) & tooling less EVM‑like” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative

“Best for Ultra-Low Fees & Speed: Solana Ecosystem ... Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

“Raydium offers fast execution and low transaction costs of fractions of a cent on Solana, combined with deep liquidity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative

Also compared

ControlUp vs Uniswap ControlUp vs Raydium PancakeSwap vs Uniswap PancakeSwap vs Raydium Nexthink Infinity vs Uniswap Nexthink Infinity vs Raydium Uniswap vs 1inch Uniswap vs Jupiter Uniswap vs Curve 1inch vs Raydium Jupiter vs Raydium Curve vs Raydium All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.