Digital employee experience · October 2026 Edition
Nexthink Infinity vs Raydium
Two of fourteen models named Nexthink Infinity first on the direct prompt; zero named Raydium. Nexthink Infinity was named by ten of the fourteen models and Raydium by ten and Nexthink Infinity carries 16 labels and Raydium 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Raydium
criticized challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share10%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate31%29%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1614A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Nexthink Infinity reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ControlUp vs Nexthink Infinity · ControlUp vs Raydium · PancakeSwap vs Nexthink Infinity
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the digital employee experience page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Nexthink InfinityFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRaydiumDirect201 against Nexthink Infinity
Paraphrase203 against Nexthink Infinity
Comparative00
Budget-constrained011 against Nexthink Infinity · 1 against Raydium
Scale-constrained10
Negative013 against Raydium
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Nexthink Infinity and Raydium stood in it.
| Model | DirectRA | ParaphraseRA | ComparativeRA | Budget-constrainedRA | Scale-constrainedRA | NegativeRA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | RA | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | RA | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | RA | | RA | |||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | RA | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | RA | RA | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | RA | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | RA | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | RA | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Nexthink InfinityRA Raydium first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Nexthink Infinity on the left and Raydium on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Nexthink Infinity and Raydium stood in it.
Nexthink Infinity first, Raydium not the choice
2 of 14 modelsRaydium was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniNexthink Infinity alternatives: HappySignals, TeamViewer DEX
MiniMax M2.5ControlUp, Nexthink Infinity
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Kimi K2ControlUp alternatives: 1E, Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity, Riverbed Aternity
GLM 4.7 FlashXControlUp, TeamViewer DEX alternatives: 1E, Lakeside Software, Nexthink Infinity
GPT-6 LunaControlUp alternatives: Lakeside SysTrack, Nexthink Infinity
Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Uniswap alternatives: dYdX
Gemini 3.5 FlashControlUp alternatives: 1E, 1inch Network, Bebop, Kentico, Liferay DXP, Optimizely, TeamViewer DEX
Perplexity SonarControlUp
Grok 4.1 FastCitrix ShareFile alternatives: Box for Business, Firmex, iDeals Virtual Data Room
Mistral Small1inch Network, Uniswap alternatives: LetsExchange
DeepSeek V4 Flash1inch Network alternatives: CoW Swap, Jupiter, Matcha, ParaSwap, Uniswap
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashCorcentric, Nautical Commerce alternatives: BigCommerce, Boomi, Shopify
Muse Glimmer 30BMagnolia, Progress Sitefinity alternatives: Contentful, HubSpot Content Hub, Optimizely, Sitecore Digital Experience Platform, XM Cloud
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Nexthink Infinity0%#9 of 9Raydium0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →Mid-marketThe figures above
Nexthink Infinity leads by eight points.
Nexthink Infinity10%#3 of 12Raydium2%#8 of 12
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Nexthink Infinity leads by forty-four points.
Nexthink Infinity44%#1 of 7Raydium0%#– of 7
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Nexthink Infinity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid (For Now) for Mid-Sized B2B: Nexthink & Lakeside SysTrack: ... It's overkill and often overpriced” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Traditional enterprise DEX tools (like Nexthink or Lakeside SysTrack) are powerful, but they require heavy financial investments, complex deployments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“While competitors like Nexthink are powerful, they are often too complex, expensive, and heavy for smaller IT teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“For mid-market specifically, ControlUp and Nexthink are often recommended due to their scalability and comprehensive feature sets.” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Top platforms to consider (2024-2026 reports): Nexthink (strong analytics)” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Nexthink is the strongest default choice for a mid-market B2B company” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Raydium
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Raydium: ~93% of liquidity pools exhibit rug pull patterns” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“up to 93% of its ~388,000 analyzed liquidity pools were flagged as suspected rug pulls” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Ultra‑cheap, but development environment is different (Rust) & tooling less EVM‑like” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Best for Ultra-Low Fees & Speed: Solana Ecosystem ... Platform: Raydium (for liquidity pools) or Jupiter (for swapping/execution).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Stick to well-established, heavily used DEXs like Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Jupiter, or Raydium” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Raydium offers fast execution and low transaction costs of fractions of a cent on Solana, combined with deep liquidity.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
ControlUp vs Nexthink InfinityControlUp vs RaydiumPancakeSwap vs Nexthink InfinityPancakeSwap vs RaydiumNexthink Infinity vs UniswapNexthink Infinity vs 1inchNexthink Infinity vs JupiterNexthink Infinity vs CurveUniswap vs Raydium1inch vs RaydiumJupiter vs RaydiumCurve vs RaydiumAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full DEX standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.