AIOps platforms · October 2026 Edition
Dynatrace vs PagerDuty
Six of fourteen models named Dynatrace first on the direct prompt; one named PagerDuty. Dynatrace was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and PagerDuty by seven and Dynatrace carries 49 labels and PagerDuty 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate27%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels4914A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Dynatrace reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.New Relic was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. New Relic vs Dynatrace · New Relic vs PagerDuty · Datadog vs Dynatrace
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the aiops platforms page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
DynatraceFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPagerDuty
Direct615 against Dynatrace
Paraphrase101 against Dynatrace
Comparative80
Budget-constrained004 against Dynatrace
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Dynatrace · 1 against PagerDuty
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Dynatrace and PagerDuty stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Dynatrace PagerDuty first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Dynatrace on the left and PagerDuty on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Dynatrace and PagerDuty stood in it.
Dynatrace first, PagerDuty not the choice
6 of 14 modelsPagerDuty was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDynatrace alternatives: Datadog, New Relic, Splunk
Mistral SmallDynatrace alternatives: BigPanda, LogicMonitor, New Relic
Llama 4 MaverickDynatrace
Qwen 3.7 FlashDynatrace alternatives: BigPanda, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana Cloud, OpenTelemetry
GLM 4.7 FlashXDynatrace alternatives: Datadog, Freshservice, ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, New Relic
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog, Dynatrace, New Relic alternatives: Freshservice
PagerDuty first, Dynatrace not the choice
1 of 14 modelsDynatrace was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5PagerDuty alternatives: BigPanda, LogicMonitor, New Relic
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashDatadog, LogicMonitor alternatives: New Relic, PagerDuty
DeepSeek V4 FlashLogicMonitor, New Relic alternatives: BigPanda, Freshservice, PagerDuty
MiniMax M2.5Datadog, New Relic alternatives: Dynatrace
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Dynatrace, New Relic
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Perplexity SonarNew Relic alternatives: Coralogix
Grok 4.1 FastDatadog alternatives: New Relic
Kimi K2New Relic alternatives: Datadog, LogicMonitor
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Dynatrace3%#10 of 16PagerDuty3%#8 of 16Mid-marketThe figures above
Dynatrace leads by eleven points.
Dynatrace13%#3 of 10PagerDuty2%#7 of 10Enterprise
Dynatrace leads by thirty-nine points.
Dynatrace39%#1 of 11PagerDuty0%#10 of 11What the models said about Dynatrace
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Platforms to Avoid (For Now) ... Dynatrace is exceptionally precise, but its premium pricing and complex configuration require dedicated platform engineering teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Choose Dynatrace if: You want a "all-in-one" solution where you don't need third-party monitors, and you require automated code-level root cause identification.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Dynatrace and BigPanda are often recommended due to their scalability, ease of integration, and strong noise reduction features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Dynatrace is the best overall AIOps platform due to its robust features, strong user ratings, and suitability for mid-market needs” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about PagerDuty
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.