AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › IT operations and endpoint › AIOps › LogicMonitor vs PagerDuty
AIOps platforms · October 2026 Edition

LogicMonitor vs PagerDuty

Two of fourteen models named LogicMonitor first on the direct prompt; one named PagerDuty. LogicMonitor was named by eight of the fourteen models and PagerDuty by seven and LogicMonitor carries 11 labels and PagerDuty 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

LogicMonitor

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

PagerDuty

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%7%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels1114A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, LogicMonitor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.New Relic was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. New Relic vs LogicMonitor · New Relic vs PagerDuty · Datadog vs LogicMonitor

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the aiops platforms page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LogicMonitorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPagerDuty
Direct21
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against PagerDuty
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where LogicMonitor and PagerDuty stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
LogicMonitor PagerDuty first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, LogicMonitor on the left and PagerDuty on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where LogicMonitor and PagerDuty stood in it.

LogicMonitor first, PagerDuty an alternative

2 of 14 modelsPagerDuty was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDatadog, LogicMonitor alternatives: New Relic, PagerDuty
DeepSeek V4 FlashLogicMonitor, New Relic alternatives: BigPanda, Freshservice, PagerDuty

PagerDuty first, LogicMonitor an alternative

1 of 14 modelsLogicMonitor was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5PagerDuty alternatives: BigPanda, LogicMonitor, New Relic

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallDynatrace alternatives: BigPanda, LogicMonitor, New Relic
Kimi K2New Relic alternatives: Datadog, LogicMonitor

Neither was named

9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniDynatrace alternatives: Datadog, New Relic, Splunk
Perplexity SonarNew Relic alternatives: Coralogix
Grok 4.1 FastDatadog alternatives: New Relic
Llama 4 MaverickDynatrace
Qwen 3.7 FlashDynatrace alternatives: BigPanda, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana Cloud, OpenTelemetry
GLM 4.7 FlashXDynatrace alternatives: Datadog, Freshservice, ManageEngine OpManager Nexus, New Relic
MiniMax M2.5Datadog, New Relic alternatives: Dynatrace
GPT-6 LunaDatadog alternatives: Dynatrace, New Relic
Muse Glimmer 30BDatadog, Dynatrace, New Relic alternatives: Freshservice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PagerDuty leads by three points.
PagerDuty3%#8 of 16
LogicMonitor0%#– of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: LogicMonitor leads at mid-market.
LogicMonitor4%#6 of 10
PagerDuty2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
LogicMonitor leads by two points.
LogicMonitor2%#– of 11
PagerDuty0%#10 of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about LogicMonitor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Best for Hybrid IT & Infrastructure: LogicMonitor (featuring Edwin AI) ... LogicMonitor is a highly recommended solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“New Relic and LogicMonitor are the strongest all-around AIOps platforms” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about PagerDuty

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.