Every category where a model named AWS CodeArtifact for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Artifact and container registries	Developer platform	0%	23 of 89	0%	17	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AWS CodeArtifact yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AWS CodeArtifact across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	4	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained15 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“their native registries (AWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry, or Azure Artifacts) are highly practical options” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Artifact registries · direct prompt · alternative

“Best if: You are 100% committed to a single cloud provider and want deep integration with their IAM, KMS, and private networking.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Artifact registries · scale prompt · alternative

“Pay-per-use (~$14/month for small team est.) | AWS users | Bills on storage/requests; no self-host” Grok 4.1 Fast · Artifact registries · budget prompt · alternative

“AWS CodeArtifact | AWS shops | Cheap, multi-format, IAM integration. | AWS-only, less UI.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Artifact registries · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AWS CodeArtifact, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AWS CodeArtifact was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JFrog Artifactory46 of 5420Not among the top eight

GitHub Packages33 of 5410Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository28 of 549Not among the top eight

Google Artifact Registry24 of 540Not among the top eight

Cloudsmith23 of 544Not among the top eight

Azure Artifacts17 of 540Not among the top eight

Harbor13 of 540Not among the top eight

GitLab Package Registry12 of 545Not among the top eight

Sonatype Lifecycle12 of 540Not among the top eight

Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS5 of 542Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS CodeArtifact. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 54 answers that named AWS CodeArtifact and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jfrog.com26

sonatype.com25

thectoclub.com24

cloudrepo.io22

harness.io22

imaginarycloud.com18

cloudsmith.com16

itechguides.com14

zipdo.co14

devopsschool.com13

194 of the 194 domain citations in answers naming AWS CodeArtifact came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thectoclub.com/tools/best-artifact-repository-tools24

imaginarycloud.com/blog/best-artifact-repository-tools18

harness.io/blog/best-artifact-repository-tools17

sonatype.com/compare/best-artifact-repository-solutions17

sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository16

cloudrepo.io/articles/best-artifactory-alternatives14

jfrog.com/pricing12

zipdo.co/best/artifact-software12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where AWS CodeArtifact stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“aws codeartifact”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 40 a month
Its own site: It sits on AWS's site (aws.amazon.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 23 of 89 in artifact registries

Segment leader

14%

JFrog Artifactory

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 54 answers
Its own site cited: in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow AWS CodeArtifact

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

AWS is the company behind AWS CodeArtifact.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from AWS: AWS ACM, AWS ACM Private CA, AWS ALB, AWS ALB/ELB, AWS ALB/NLB, AWS API Gateway HTTP APIs, AWS Amazon Aurora, AWS App Runner and 87 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Secure, scalable, and cost-effective package management for software development
aws.amazon.com/codeartifact
For: teams and build systems
aws.amazon.com/codeartifact
Price stated: Only pay for software packages stored, number of requests made, and data transferred out of Region with pay-as-you-go pricing. aws.amazon.com/codeartifact
Free plan or trial: Get started for free aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/pricing
Hosting: USA Ost (Nord-Virginia)USA Ost (Ohio)USA West (Oregon)EU (Irland)EU (London)EU (Frankfurt)EU (Stockholm)EU (Mailand)
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, customers

What AWS CodeArtifact's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: aws.amazon.com/codeartifact, aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/sla, aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/pricing, aws.amazon.com/codeartifact/features, aws.amazon.com/de/codeartifact/faq. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AWS CodeArtifact's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AWS CodeArtifact, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for AWS CodeArtifact by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where AWS CodeArtifact is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name AWS CodeArtifact, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.