AI Indexes
IT AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Developer platform › Artifact registries › Small business › October 2026 Edition

Artifact and container registries for small business buyers

Asked as “artifact repository”, and as “container registry”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 63 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · GitLab Package Registry 8%
33GitHub Packages08GitLab Package Registry06JFrog Artifactory52others

33% of first choices, contested.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
01GitHub Packages33%10%60endorsed leader
02GitLab Package Registry8%0%10accepted challenger
03JFrog Artifactory6%57%40criticized challenger
04Harbor5%28%40criticized challenger
05Sonatype Nexus Repository5%0%14accepted challenger
06Docker Hub5%63%35criticized challenger
07Cloudsmith3%26%19criticized challenger
08AWS CodeArtifact2%0%16accepted challenger
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Amazon ECR0%17%12accepted challenger
11AWS ECR0%15%13accepted challenger
10Azure Container Registry0%11%27accepted challenger
09Google Artifact Registry Lab in the set0%9%33accepted challenger
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Artifact Registry is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
G01
02
03
04
05
06
07
A08
G09
A10
A11
A12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01GitHub Packages33%
02GitLab Package Registry8%
03JFrog Artifactory6%
04Harbor5%
05Sonatype Nexus Repository5%
06Docker Hub5%
07Cloudsmith3%
08AWS CodeArtifact2%
09Google Artifact Registry0%
10Azure Container Registry0%
11AWS ECR0%
12Amazon ECR0%

What they warned about

Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Docker Hub
63%
22 of 35 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid Docker Hub's Free Tier for active team development. The rate limits will eventually cause intermittent pipeline failures” Gemini 3.5 Flash, comparative prompt
JFrog Artifactory
57%
23 of 40 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“**Verdict:** **Avoid** unless you have a dedicated platform team and a budget specifically for managing a massive variety of non-container artifacts.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Harbor
28%
11 of 40 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“**Avoid for small teams:** ... Harbor (too much ops overhead unless compliance requires it)” DeepSeek V4 Flash, comparative prompt
GitHub Packages
10%
6 of 60 labels negative · 5 of 14 models
“you can pull from Docker Hub / GitHub Container Registry for dev/testing, but you should never build production images directly from unproven community tags” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 999 links across 213 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.

31 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CloudRepo30 answers · 42 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Gitnux25 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Harness24 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · JFrog21 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · ZipDo.co19 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
vendor site · GitHub16 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Railway16 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Sonatype15 answers · 30 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SourceForge15 answers · 21 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “artifact and container registries”, “artifact repository”, “best artifact repository”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
GitHub parent site
GitHub Packages 33%
33%1041,500,00031,479
Sonatype sonatype.com
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS 6%, Sonatype Nexus Repository 5%, Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition 3%, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS / Community Edition 2%
16%687203871,814 company$1,87975
GitLab parent site
GitLab Package Registry 8%
8%1690,5004,844
JFrog Artifactory jfrog.com6%1362,90017238,697$371201
Harbor goharbor.io5%11674,000331,9183,420
DigitalOcean parent site
DigitalOcean Container Registry 5%
5%974,000942
Docker Hub docker.com5%7449,5002301,141,29716
Cloudsmith cloudsmith.com3%621,300253,190$98234
AWS parent site
AWS CodeArtifact 2%
2%47368,000114,001
Verdaccio2%1,00021

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (harness.io, itechguides.com, jfrog.com, sonatype.com, sourceforge.net). The first result for “artifact and container registries” is docs.cloud.google.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best artifact repository for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which container registry would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top artifact and container registries for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best artifact repository for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an artifact repository. What should we look at?”Negative“Which artifact and container registries should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Nexus Repository
against: Maven Central, PyPI, npm Registry
Docker Hub, GitHub PackagesChanged
One alternativeAmazon ECR
Dist
Four alternativesGitea, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
GitHub Packages, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, CloudRepo, Dist, Google Artifact Registry
against: Artifactory
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub
GPT-5.4 miniGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
One alternativeAWS CodeArtifact
against: JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Docker Hub, GitHub PackagesChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
GitHub Packages
Five alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitLab Container Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub
Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition
Two alternativesApache Archiva, JFrog Artifactory Open Source
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, GitHub, PyPI, npm public registry
Gemini 3.5 FlashGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, Google Artifact Registry
against: JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
GitHub PackagesChanged
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry
against: Harbor
GitHub Packages
Four alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitLab Container & Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Five alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager, Verdaccio
against: JFrog Artifactory
Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, ECR, Google Artifact Registry
against: JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus OSS
against: AWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GCP Artifact Registry, GitHub Packages, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory SaaS, Self-Hosted GitLab Registry, Sonatype Nexus OSS
Perplexity SonarSonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesAzure Artifacts, Cloudsmith
against: JFrog Artifactory
HarborChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, DigitalOcean Container Registry
against: JFrog Container Registry
Google Artifact Registry
Five alternativesCloudsmith, Docker Hub, Harbor, ProGet, Verdaccio
Sonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, CloudRepo
against: JFrog Artifactory
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.1 FastAWS CodeArtifact
Two alternativesGitHub Packages, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
GitHub PackagesChanged
Three alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
against: Docker Hub, Harbor
GitHub Packages
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry
against: Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Three alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab, Harbor
against: JFrog Artifactory OSS
no first choiceagainst: AWS ECR, Artifactory, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, Maven Central, PyPI, Sonatype Nexus OSS, npm
Mistral SmallCloudRepo, Packagecloudagainst: Azure ArtifactsDigitalOcean Container Registry, HarborChanged
Three alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
Harbor
Eight alternativesAmazon ECR, Cloudsmith, Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory, Railway, Verdaccio
Harbor, Nexus OSS
One alternativeVerdaccio
no first choiceagainst: Cloudsmith, JFrog Artifactoryagainst: Docker Hub
DeepSeek V4 FlashJFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
Two alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Packages
against: Cloudsmith
GitHub PackagesChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Harbor
GitHub Packages, GitLab Container Registry + Package Registry
Three alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry
against: Docker Hub, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype Nexus Repository
Three alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
against: Artifactory, Cloudsmith, JFrog Artifactory OSS
no first choice
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages, ProGet
against: Docker Hub, Docker Registry on bare metal, GitHub Packages, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Llama 4 MaverickJitPack
Two alternativesAzure Artifacts, Packagecloud
DigitalOcean Container RegistryChanged
One alternativeHarbor
no first choicePkgly
Four alternativesCloudRepo, Cloudsmith, JitPack, Verdaccio
no first choiceagainst: ACR, Artifact Registry, Docker Hub, ECR, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
Qwen 3.7 FlashGitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Two alternativesAzure Artifacts, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: JFrog Artifactory
GitHub PackagesChanged
Three alternativesACR, ECR, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub
GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Two alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, Harbor
against: Docker Hub
GitHub Packages
Six alternativesCloudsmith, GitLab Packages, Harbor, ProGet, Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS, Verdaccio
against: JFrog Artifactory, Packagecloud
JFrog Artifactory
Five alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Ultimate, Harbor, JFrog Platform, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Amazon S3, Azure Blob Storage, Docker Registry v2, Google Container Registry, docker.io
Kimi K2Cloudsmith, GitHub Packages
One alternativeSonatype Nexus Repository
against: JFrog Artifactory
GitHub PackagesChanged
Three alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, DigitalOcean Container Registry
GitHub Packages, GitLab Package Registry
Four alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Two alternativesGitLab Package Registry, Harbor
JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Cloud
Five alternativesACR, ECR, GCR, GitHub Packages, GitLab Registry
against: Harbor, Nexus OSS
against: Docker Hub
GLM 4.7 FlashXNexus Repository
Four alternativesCloudRepo, GitHub Packages, Harbor, ProGet
against: JFrog Artifactory, Pulp
GitHub PackagesChanged
One alternativeHarbor
GitHub Packages
Six alternativesACR, Artifact Registry, Dist, Docker Hub, ECR, Harbor
against: JFrog Artifactory
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS
Four alternativesGitHub Packages, GitLab Packages, Harbor, Reposilite
against: Cloudsmith
no first choiceagainst: Amazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Docker Hub, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
MiniMax M2.5no first choiceDigitalOcean Container Registry, Google Container RegistryChanged
One alternativeGitHub Packages
against: Amazon ECR
Docker Hub
Four alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory
against: Distribution
Verdaccio
Two alternativesGitHub Packages, Nexus Repository OSS
no first choiceagainst: Docker Hub, Google Container Registry, Harbor
GPT-6 LunaGitHub Packages
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Cloudsmith
against: JFrog Artifactory
Docker HubChanged
Three alternativesAmazon ECR, Artifact Registry, Azure Container Registry
GitHub Packages
Four alternativesAmazon ECR, Azure Container Registry, GitLab Container Registry + Package Registry, Google Artifact Registry
against: Cloudsmith, Docker Hub, JFrog Artifactory
GitHub Packages, GitLab
One alternativeSonatype Nexus Repository Community Edition
no first choice
Two alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Your existing code-hosting platform's package registry
against: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Google Container Registry
Muse Glimmer 30BGitHub Packages
Three alternativesCloudsmith, Dist, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: JFrog Artifactory
GitHub Container Registry, GHCRChanged
Seven alternativesAWS ECR, Azure Container Registry, DigitalOcean Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Quay
against: Docker Hub
GitHub Packages
Five alternativesAmazon Elastic Container Registry, GitLab Container Registry, Google Artifact Registry, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory
against: Docker Hub
Sonatype Nexus Repository OSS / Community Edition
Six alternativesArtifact Depot, Dist, GitHub Packages, JFrog Artifactory OSS, Nexspence — Universal Artifact Repository Manager, Repsy
GitHub Packages
Four alternativesAWS CodeArtifact, Google Artifact Registry, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Nexus Repository
against: Docker Hub, GitHub Packages, Harbor, JFrog Artifactory, Sonatype Lifecycle
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:05no04 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 00:51yes34 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:38yes924 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:40yes153 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-04 23:48yes2110 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:38yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:50yes2340 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:01yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:53yes528 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:28yes1824 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:18yes1351 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:51yes532 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:19yes49 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:56yes2326 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-04 22:45no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:55no03 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:26no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:15yes403 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:17yes249 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 01:32yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 23:11yes2337 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:05yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:08yes940 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:35yes1842 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:50yes2322 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:31yes1385 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:26yes213 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:55yes1422 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:01yes1810 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 22:48yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 22:15yes1731 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:13yes245 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:17yes1810 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:51yes156 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 01:38yes2467 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-04 23:18yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:02no028 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 01:09yes1526 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-05 01:34yes1536 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:21yes516 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:02yes729 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 23:43yes1526 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 01:14yes99 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:01yes54 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-04 23:36yes1126 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-05 00:48yes152 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:28yes209 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:09yes53 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:30yes2119 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:24yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:48yes525 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 23:39yes1533 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 23:55yes1925 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-04 23:42yes1323 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 01:39yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-04 22:47yes1418 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:51no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-05 01:33no010 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:50yes1231 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 23:29yes186 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 01:30yes128 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-05 00:35no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-04 22:11yes2237 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 01:08yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 01:11no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-05 00:05yes1049 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:16yes1954 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:57yes516 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-04 23:56yes423 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 00:17yes1319 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-05 00:45yes189 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-04 23:07yes24 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-05 01:11yes1231 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-04 22:12yes233 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-05 00:31yes2415 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-04 23:27yes54 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-05 00:37yes2558 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-05 00:47yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-05 00:01yes1033 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-04 22:31yes2240 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-04 22:41yes2262 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-05 01:02yes2247 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-05 00:58yes422 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-05 01:27yes1836 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Elastic Container Registry (ECR) read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
AWS Elastic Container Registry, ECR read as Amazon Elastic Container Registry
Azure ACR read as Azure Container Registry
GitHub Container Registry read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) + GitHub Packages read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) / GitHub Packages read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry (`ghcr.io`) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Container Registry `ghcr.io` read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages & GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages / GHCR (ghcr.io) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages / GitHub Container Registry (GHCR) read as GitHub Packages
GitHub Packages/GHCR read as GitHub Packages
Google Container Registry (GCR) / Artifact Registry read as Google Artifact Registry
JFrog read as JFrog Artifactory
Unresolved, counted raw
Distribution (Docker Registry)
Docker Registry on bare metal
Docker Registry v2
GitHub Container Registry, GHCR
GitLab Registry
JFrog Artifactory SaaS
JFrog Cloud
JFrog Platform
Nexspence — Universal Artifact Repository Manager
Nexus Repository Manager (OSS)
Nexus v3+
Pkgly
Pulp
Self-Hosted GitLab Registry
Sonatype Cloud
Sonatype Nexus Cloud
Sonatype Nexus Repository Manager (OSS / Community Edition)
Your existing code-hosting platform's package registry
docker.io (Docker Hub)
npm public registry
npmjs.org
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← App shieldingCI/CD →