AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › WinPure · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

WinPure

3Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. WinPure was named 2 times in Master data, where Profisee MDM led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 101
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 92
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In master data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named WinPure for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Master data managementData platform0%23 of 920%2under 10 labels · led by Profisee MDM at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WinPure yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WinPure across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Non-technical users | WinPure” Kimi K2 · Master data · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WinPure, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WinPure was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Pimcore2 of 32Not among the top eight
AtroCore MDM2 of 31Not among the top eight
Boomi Data Hub2 of 30Not among the top eight
Ataccama ONE1 of 30Not among the top eight
Boomi Master Data Hub1 of 30Not among the top eight
IBM InfoSphere1 of 30Not among the top eight
Informatica MDM1 of 30Not among the top eight
Profisee Application Edition1 of 30Not among the top eight
Reltio1 of 30Not among the top eight
Salesforce Data Cloud1 of 30Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WinPure. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named WinPure and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atrocore.com3
sourceforge.net3
winpure.comYour site3
datamation.com2
g2.com2
larksuite.com2
us.fitgap.com2
airdroid.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1
deel.com1

Seventeen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming WinPure came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

winpure.com/master-data-management-tools3
atrocore.com/en/blog/best-master-data-management-tools2
atrocore.com/en/blog/master-data-management-tools2
atrocore.com/en/blog/open-source-master-data-management2
datamation.com/big-data/master-data-management-tools2
larksuite.com/en_us/blog/tools-for-master-data-management2
sourceforge.net/software/master-data-management/for-small-business2
airdroid.com/mdm/free-mobile-device-management1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

winpure.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, WinPure takes 0% of first choices and Profisee MDM takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “master data management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “master data management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 3,248 a month
Searches its site ranks for
839 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it
1,260
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
10 ads · 8 text, 2 image · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2023, as WinPure Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 5 in the year, 5 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 92 in master data
Segment leader
41%
Profisee MDM
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
3 answers
Its own site cited
in 3 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on winpure.com
407
subdomains included
Content
132
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog82152026-09-11
Case study2402024-11-15
Glossary or explainer9undated
Comparison732026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event402026-03-04
Report or ebook202025-01-30
Template or tool202025-12-17
News or press202024-11-12

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page winpure.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow WinPure

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

WinPure is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Trusted Enterprise Data Quality Solution Provider
winpure.com
For
SME businesses
winpure.com
Price stated
$999 winpure.com
Starting price
999 winpure.com
Free plan or trial
Free 30-days trial winpure.com
Hosting
AzureAWSother cloud platformsWindows serverdesktop
Customers named
RES QLuton Borough CouncilL’Amy AmericaDrinxSjobeckGlobal FMCG BrandGerman Agriculture Machinery BrandBrotherhood MutualSignetor
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications

What WinPure's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: winpure.com, winpure.com/plans-pricing, winpure.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WinPure's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WinPure, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for WinPure by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where WinPure is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name WinPure, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at winpure.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.