Every category where a model named Uptime Kuma for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Website and synthetic monitoring	IT operations and endpoint	4%	9 of 67	0%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uptime Kuma yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uptime Kuma across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	3	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2
GPT-6 Luna	0	2	2
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained24 labels3

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative8 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative54 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Most teams with limited budgets find Uptime Kuma (if self-hosted) or UptimeRobot (free plan) to be the best starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice

“For Self-Hosting (Completely Free): Uptime Kuma. It is an incredibly popular, open-source, self-hosted dashboard” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose Uptime Kuma if you have a developer on hand and want unlimited, 20-second interval monitoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice

“open-source uptime monitoring tool you run yourself ... However, the tradeoff is that you are responsible for keeping your monitoring system online” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uptime Kuma, over the 54 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uptime Kuma was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

UptimeRobot44 of 5424Not among the top eight

Better Stack25 of 545Not among the top eight

Pingdom19 of 541Not among the top eight

StatusCake17 of 542Not among the top eight

Site24x716 of 542Not among the top eight

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring16 of 541Not among the top eight

Zabbix14 of 542Not among the top eight

New Relic Synthetics11 of 541Not among the top eight

Checkly7 of 541Not among the top eight

HetrixTools6 of 542Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uptime Kuma. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 54 answers that named Uptime Kuma and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uptimerobot.com34

hyperping.com25

motadata.com19

runcloud.io14

betterstack.com13

github.com11

tryanalyze.ai11

comparitech.com10

site24x7.com10

g2.com9

156 of the 156 domain citations in answers naming Uptime Kuma came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

runcloud.io/blog/top-website-uptime-monitoring-tools14

uptimerobot.com/knowledge-hub/comparisons-and-alternatives/13-best-website-monitoring-tool13

motadata.com/blog/best-website-monitoring-tools12

tryanalyze.ai/blog/website-monitoring-tools11

uptimerobot.com/pricing10

hostingadvice.com/how-to/website-uptime-monitoring9

onlineornot.com/uptime-monitoring-tools9

site24x7.com/blog/best-website-monitoring-tools-20269

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

uptime.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Uptime Kuma takes 4% of first choices and UptimeRobot takes 24%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “uptime monitoring tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “website monitoring tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“uptime kuma”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 9 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 50,059 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 8,269 · 345 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,260
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $42 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

42 ads · 40 text, 2 image · 12 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2022, as Uptime.com LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 2 in the year, 40 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 9 of 67 in uptime monitoring

Segment leader

24%

UptimeRobot

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 54 answers
Its own site cited: in 51 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on uptime.com

8,110

subdomains included

Content

210

counted in the table below

Documentation

322

Product · Integration

2 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	146	0	2025-02-12	Uptime monitoring, CDN
News or press	20	undated
Glossary or explainer	12	0	2025-01-20
Case study	9	undated
Comparison	9	0	2023-03-21
Conference or event	6	0	2023-11-08
Report or ebook	4	undated
Webinar or virtual event	2	0	2024-01-30
Template or tool	2	undated

Most recent

2025-02-12The Best API Monitoring Tools in 2025: A Complete Guide blog
2025-02-05Shopify store check types blog
2025-01-30How to monitor status pages blog
2025-01-22How to monitor website performance blog
2025-01-20What is api monitoring glossary or explainer
2025-01-14Ui updates january 2025 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page uptime.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Uptime Kuma

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uptime Kuma's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uptime Kuma, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Uptime Kuma by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Uptime Kuma is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Uptime Kuma, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.