AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › HetrixTools · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

HetrixTools

13Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. HetrixTools was named 6 times in Uptime monitoring, where UptimeRobot led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In uptime monitoring · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HetrixTools for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Website and synthetic monitoringIT operations and endpoint4%10 of 6717%6under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HetrixTools yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HetrixTools across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The sweet spot for most budget-conscious companies is HetrixTools or UptimeRobot at under $10/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“HetrixTools Free – best hosted free tier for business use” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“HetrixTools gives you 15 monitors at 1-minute intervals with multiple alerting channels on the free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
“Popular alternatives like Pingdom or HetrixTools have fewer complaints but verify yourself.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some users find the service to be expensive relative to its offerings, there is no option for multi-step monitor” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HetrixTools, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HetrixTools was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
UptimeRobot13 of 136Not among the top eight
Site24x78 of 131Not among the top eight
StatusCake7 of 130Not among the top eight
Uptime Kuma6 of 130Not among the top eight
Better Stack4 of 130Not among the top eight
Cronitor4 of 130Not among the top eight
New Relic Synthetics4 of 130Not among the top eight
Pingdom4 of 130Not among the top eight
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring3 of 131Not among the top eight
Hyperping3 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HetrixTools. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named HetrixTools and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uptimerobot.com10
hyperping.com9
tryanalyze.ai9
motadata.com6
onlineornot.com5
runcloud.io5
bootstrap.build4
dotcom-monitor.com4
odown.com4
buyersprint.com3

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming HetrixTools came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

hetrixtools.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HetrixTools takes 4% of first choices and UptimeRobot takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “uptime monitoring tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “website monitoring tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
390 a month (“hetrixtools”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,354 a month
Searches its site ranks for
404 · 15 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,387
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2022, as HetrixTools Inc, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 67 in uptime monitoring
Segment leader
24%
UptimeRobot
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on hetrixtools.com
759
subdomains included
Content
15
counted in the table below
Documentation
711
Product · Integration
7 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Comparison802017-04-06
Template or tool302025-04-30
Glossary or explainer302025-03-27
Report or ebook1undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hetrixtools.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as HetrixTools

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HetrixTools; a claim can dispute any of them.
HetrixTools Free 1

Follow HetrixTools

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

HetrixTools is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Free Uptime Monitor & Blacklist Monitor
For
Monitor your websites, servers, IPs and domains in one place
Price stated
Free forever hetrixtools.com
Starting price
0 hetrixtools.com
Free plan or trial
15 monitors free forever; 32 monitors free forever hetrixtools.com
Integrations claimed
21 hetrixtools.com · 20 hetrixtools.com/pricing/uptime-monitor pages disagree
Hosting
New YorkSan FranciscoDallasAmsterdamLondonFrankfurtSingaporeSydney
Customers named
KnownHostAlbaHostServerAstra Ltd.Galaxy Web Solutions LtdGGServers Ltd.SMTPServerVIRTBIZElixant Technology
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What HetrixTools's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hetrixtools.com, hetrixtools.com/pricing/uptime-monitor, hetrixtools.com/feature/mcp, hetrixtools.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HetrixTools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HetrixTools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HetrixTools by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HetrixTools is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HetrixTools, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hetrixtools.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.