| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Website and synthetic monitoring | IT operations and endpoint | 4% | 10 of 67 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by UptimeRobot at 24% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The sweet spot for most budget-conscious companies is HetrixTools or UptimeRobot at under $10/month” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“HetrixTools Free – best hosted free tier for business use” Muse Glimmer 30B · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · first choice
“HetrixTools gives you 15 monitors at 1-minute intervals with multiple alerting channels on the free plan” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · budget prompt · alternative
“Popular alternatives like Pingdom or HetrixTools have fewer complaints but verify yourself.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some users find the service to be expensive relative to its offerings, there is no option for multi-step monitor” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Uptime monitoring · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named HetrixTools and are not a share of its labels.
Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming HetrixTools came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
First shown September 2022, as HetrixTools Inc, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2017-04-06 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | 0 | 2025-03-27 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page hetrixtools.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What HetrixTools's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hetrixtools.com, hetrixtools.com/pricing/uptime-monitor, hetrixtools.com/feature/mcp, hetrixtools.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HetrixTools's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HetrixTools, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HetrixTools by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: