IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › UpCloud Managed Kubernetes · September 2026 Edition

UpCloud · 1 category · Named, not ranked

UpCloud Managed Kubernetes

13Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UpCloud Managed Kubernetes was named 6 times in Managed Kubernetes, where Google Kubernetes Engine led with 39%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business15 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market14 of 48

under the label threshold

Enterprise54 of 62

under the label threshold

In managed kubernetes · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UpCloud Managed Kubernetes for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Managed Kubernetes platforms	Cloud and infrastructure	0%	14 of 48	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Google Kubernetes Engine at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UpCloud Managed Kubernetes yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UpCloud Managed Kubernetes across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“UpCloud (UKS): ... known for speed (clusters launch in minutes) and excellent Terraform support.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed Kubernetes · direct prompt · alternative

“platforms like Civo, UpCloud, or DigitalOcean can help you launch fast” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UpCloud Managed Kubernetes, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpCloud Managed Kubernetes was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DigitalOcean Kubernetes12 of 135Not in the top three

Civo11 of 134Not in the top three

Google Kubernetes Engine11 of 133Not in the top three

Azure Kubernetes Service11 of 130Not in the top three

Amazon EKS9 of 130Not in the top three

Scaleway Kapsule9 of 130Not in the top three

Linode Kubernetes Engine6 of 133Not in the top three

Red Hat OpenShift6 of 130Not in the top three

Rancher3 of 131Not in the top three

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpCloud Managed Kubernetes. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named UpCloud Managed Kubernetes and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

medium.com12

dev.to9

northflank.com9

spot.rackspace.com6

blog.railway.com5

digitalocean.com3

lucaberton.com3

portainer.io3

shattered.io3

techtarget.com3

Fifty-six of the fifty-six domain citations in answers naming UpCloud Managed Kubernetes came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

medium.com/@BuildShift/15-managed-kubernetes-platforms-ranked-for-developers-2025-9c82acad11

dev.to/dev_tips/comparing-the-top-10-managed-kubernetes-providers-2025-edition-12h88

medium.com/@devlinktips/15-managed-kubernetes-platforms-ranked-for-developers-2025-9c82aca8

northflank.com/blog/best-managed-kubernetes-platforms7

spot.rackspace.com/blog/kubernetes-managed-services6

blog.railway.com/p/best-managed-kubernetes-hosting-20265

medium.com/@elliotgraebert/comparing-the-top-eight-managed-kubernetes-providers-2ae39662395

northflank.com/blog/top-managed-kubernetes-hosting-platforms5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as UpCloud Managed Kubernetes

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UpCloud Managed Kubernetes; a claim can dispute any of them.

UpCloud 4UpCloud UKS 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpCloud Managed Kubernetes's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpCloud Managed Kubernetes, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upcloud.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.