IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Mirantis Kubernetes Engine · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

17Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Managed Kubernetes for enterprise buyers
Rank 15 of 48 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In managed kubernetes · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mirantis Kubernetes Engine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Managed Kubernetes platformsCloud and infrastructure0%15 of 480%3under 10 labels · led by Google Kubernetes Engine at 39%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mirantis Kubernetes Engine yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mirantis Kubernetes Engine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Cloud-agnostic, built on upstream standards, good for hybrid/on-prem use and multi-cloud portability.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Managed Kubernetes · negative prompt · alternative
“consider a cloud-agnostic platform like Mirantis” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Managed Kubernetes · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mirantis Kubernetes Engine was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Kubernetes Engine17 of 178Not in the top three
Amazon EKS16 of 172Not in the top three
Azure Kubernetes Service16 of 171Not in the top three
Red Hat OpenShift15 of 173Not in the top three
Rancher12 of 170Not in the top three
VMware Tanzu7 of 170Not in the top three
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform6 of 170Not in the top three
DigitalOcean Kubernetes5 of 171Not in the top three
Rackspace Spot5 of 170Not in the top three
IBM Cloud Kubernetes4 of 170Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mirantis Kubernetes Engine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Mirantis Kubernetes Engine and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spot.rackspace.com14
medium.com13
northflank.com10
portainer.io10
g2.com9
mirantis.comYour site9
lucaberton.com6
blog.railway.com5
dev.to5
technologymatch.com5

Seventy-seven of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Mirantis Kubernetes Engine came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mirantis Kubernetes Engine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mirantis Kubernetes Engine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mirantis.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack